The Concept of Bullying at work: the European tradition

By Staale Einarsen, H. Hoel, Dieter Zapf, Cary L. Cooper. 2002

720 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5682894e533c3dfadd25acd0be2f1f28f3c90f80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review (2013, positive): “(first introduced by Einarsen 2000; Einarsen et al. 2003; 2011), wherein societal, organisational and individual characteristics are presented as dynamic processes that can either hinder or contribute to the occurrence and continuation of workplace bullying; and result in individual and organisation”
Workers' perception of workplace bullying: A cross-cultural study (2011, methodology): “The European tradition has proposed one of the most accepted definitions of the phenomena to date (Einarsen et al., 2003, p. 15): ‘‘Bullying at work means harassing, offending, socially excluding someone or negatively affecting someone’s work tasks.”
Burned by Bullying in the American Workplace: Prevalence, Perception, Degree and Impact† (2007, positive): “Journal of Management Studies 44:6 September 2007 0022-2380 away described in these situations, targets often find themselves isolated, demoralized, and unable to escape or prevent the bullies’ terrorizing tactics (Einarsen et al., 2003).”
Measuring bullying at work with the short-negative acts questionnaire: identification of targets and criterion validity (2019, result): “The latter coincides strongly with the definition of workplace bullying as repeated and systematic negative behaviour during a longer period of time (Einarsen et al., 2011), herewith supporting the validity of the SNAQ.”
Workplace Bullying: Causes, Consequences, and Corrections (2010, neutral): “In later stages they lack the language to label the experience bullying but are unmistakably aware of being under attack (Einarsen et al., 2003).”
Bullying in the workplace: definition, prevalence, antecedents and consequences (2010, background): “However, when the bullying exposure had terminated, a high sense of Workplace Bullying Antecedent Conditions Various Outcome Results BULLYING IN THE WORKPLACE: DEFINITION, PREVALENCE, ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES 223 Notes: Adapted from Einarsen et al. (2003a).”
Managers in the firing line: Contributing factors to workplace bullying by staff – an interview study (2007, background): “Typically, abuse of power is associated with both the organizational structure and the formal position of the perpetrator, where the authoritive position is commonly aligned with the bullying behavior (Einarsen et al. 2003; Keashly & Jagatic 2003).”
Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach (2006, background): “(Einarsen et al., 2003, p. 15) Thus, bullying is about frequent and prolonged exposure to negative acts.”