When work and family collide: Deciding between competing role demands

By Jeffrey H. Greenhaus, Gary N. Powell. 2003

384 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/52c591daee435778399d968f20616fb9e395bff3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review (2010, background): “The boundaries between work and family domains can be difficult to navigate (see Clark, 2000; Edwards & Rothbard, 1999, 2000; Greenhaus & Powell, 2003; Kreiner, Hollensbe, & Sheep, 2006; Nippert-Eng, 1996; Rothbard, 2001), and work demands can affect spousal relationships (e.g., Bailyn, 1971;…”
DRIVING IT HOME: HOW WORKPLACE EMOTIONAL LABOR HARMS EMPLOYEE HOME LIFE (2014, background): “Research indicates that work experiences can influence spousal stress (Song, Foo, Uy, & Sun, 2011) and decisions to participate in work or family activities (Greenhaus & Powell, 2003; Ilies et al., 2007).”
Sex, Gender, and Decisions at the Family → Work Interface (2010, background): “…arena such as their role synthesis strategies (Kossek, Noe, & DeMarr, 1999), goal setting (Baltes & Heydens-Gahir, 2003), time allocation decisions (Greenhaus & Powell, 2003), and time management strategies (Adams & Jex, 1999) suggests that individuals create and modify work and family role…”
BALANCING BORDERS AND BRIDGES: NEGOTIATING THE WORK-HOME INTERFACE VIA BOUNDARY WORK TACTICS (2009, background): “…that individuals are able to prioritize work-family demands by “in-tentional allocation decisions” (Edwards & Roth-bard, 2000), and that role pressure, role salience, and role support each factor into a person’s mental calculus (Greenhaus & Powell, 2003; Hill, Darling, & Raimondi, 2003).”
The Effect of Work/Family Conflict on Intention to Quit: The Mediating Roles of Job and Life Satisfaction (2007, background): “Specifically, the directionality of conflict matters: Greenhaus and Powell (2003) found that whether a job holder decides to attend a work event or a simultaneous family event depends in part on the individual’s work salience, or the importance of the job to the individual.”
Work Demands and Work-to-Family and Family-to-Work Conflict (2005, background): “A complementary approach is proposed by Greenhaus and Powell (2003) who documented that the decision to choose a work activity versus a family activity when the two conflict is associated with the pressure, supportiveness, and salience associated with the two domains.”
Being important matters: The impact of work and family centralities on the family-to-work conflict–satisfaction relationship (2012, background): “First, as most people wish to maintain a positive self-perception, they may strive to achieve a high level of performance in the various social roles they occupy, particularly those roles that are central to their self-definition (Greenhaus and Powell, 2003; Thoits, 1991).”
Work-Family Conflict, Enrichment, and Balance under “Levels” and “Episodes” Approaches (2011, methodology): “Designs consistent with the episode approach have included lab studies (Greenhaus & Powell, 2003), random or scheduled experience sampling checklists or diaries (e.g., Poppleton et al., 2008; Williams & Alliger, 1994), the critical incident technique (Powell & Greenhaus, 2006b; Wiersma, 1994), and…”