Measuring Teaching Quality in Several European Countries
By W. van de Grift. 2014
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51c8376053ac5b543db7cf4e71143193f6bbad64
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Michelle Helms-Lorenz
- K. van Veen
- S. Mok
- Ridwan Maulana
- Ruth Harmsen
- Fritz C. Staub
- R. Saunders
- S. Kuntze
Citations in the corpus
- Does coaching, mentoring, and supervision matter for pre-service teachers’ planning skills and clarity of instruction? A meta-analysis of (quasi-)experimental studies (2021, background): “Moreover, our overall effect is based on studies using different instruments that were validated and used inwide-ranging environments to assess teaching-related skills (Danielson, 2013; van de Grift, 2014), and can therefore be considered robust.”
- Development and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour: a Rasch modelling approach (2015, unknown): “One instrument that meets this requirement does exist in the form of an observation instrument (Van de Grift, 2007, 2013; Van de Grift, Helms-Lorenz, & Maulana, 2013).”
- The relationship between beginning teachers’ stress causes, stress responses, teaching behaviour and attrition (2018, methodology): “BTs’ teaching behaviour was measured using the valid and reliable International Comparative Analysis of Learning and Teaching (ICALT; van de Grift, 2014) instrument.”