How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology?

By Sven Kepes, Michael A. McDaniel. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2013

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e60907ae279c39bb23bb627a8b3beec317bd619

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices (2018, unknown): “Whereas previous reviews (e.g., Banks et al., 2016; Grand et al., in press; Kepes & McDaniel, 2013) have focused on closely related topics like questionable research practices and publication bias, a standalone treatment of open science practices is lacking, which may explain why so many questions…”
Correlational effect size benchmarks. (2015, background): “In addition, it remains possible that by including only top-tier journals, our ES estimates are upwardly biased (e.g., due to different types of publication bias; Kepes & McDaniel, 2013).”
Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings (2017, result): “…signs were reproduced and (2) the discrepancies in the retested results greatly favored the support of hypotheses, then the presence of errors may be less likely than the “chase of statistical significance … and the strong tendency to obtain confirmed hypotheses” (Kepes and McDaniel, 2013: 254).”
The Chrysalis Effect (2017, background): “These pressures may lead researchers to engage in questionable research practices (QRPs) to bolster their chances of publication (Chen, 2011; Fanelli, 2010a, Kepes & McDaniel, 2013).”
Publication Bias in Strategic Management Research (2017, background): “For example, journals may require authors to provide raw data along with submitted manuscripts (Kepes & McDaniel, 2013).”
Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (2016, background): “We limited our search to the social sciences due to the levels of criticism of late directed toward the social and organizational sciences (for reviews see Banks et al. 2016; Kepes and McDaniel 2013; Schmidt and Hunter 2015).”
Advancing Theory by Assessing Boundary Conditions With Metaregression: A Critical Review and Best-Practice Recommendations (2018, background): “…form a timely topic in management research given the current debate about transparency and replicability of research results (Bergh, Sharp, Aguinis, & Li, 2017; Bosco, Aguinis, Field, Pierce, & Dalton, 2016; Kepes & McDaniel, 2013; O’Boyle, Banks, & Gonzalez-Mulé, 2017; Wright, 2016).”
When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress (2017, unknown): “…hypotheses, and/or suppress loser hypotheses (Bedeian, Taylor, & Miller, 2010; Bosco et al., 2016; Giner-Sorolla, 2012; Kerr & Harris, 1998, as cited in Kerr, 1998; Kepes & McDaniel, 2013; Hollenbeck & Wright, 2017; Leung, 2011; Motyl et al., 2017; O’Boyle et al., 2017; Schwab & Starbuck, 2017).”