Publication Bias in Strategic Management Research
By J. Harrison, G. Banks, J. Pollack, Ernest H. O’Boyle, Jeremy C. Short. 2017
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/256788edcf4600d8320385e510b483cdd6be3423
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
In Strategy and Management
- P. Duran
- Zaheer Khan
- Marc van Essen
- Sabrina F. Saleh
- Canan C. Mutlu
- N. Zahoor
- Omar Al‐Tabbaa
- Mike W. Peng
Citations in the corpus
- Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, unknown): “This method involves three complementary tests to detect potential differences between the retrieved HSMA mean effect size and a publication bias-adjusted mean effect size estimate: (a) Duval and Tweedie’s trim and fill (Duval, 2005), (b) cumulative meta-analysis (CMA), and (c) moderate selection mo”
- Collaboration and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights and Recommendations from a Systematic Review (2020, background): “Nonetheless, it must be acknowledged that there might be publication bias (Harrison et al. 2014).”
- Corporate Governance in China: A Meta‐Analysis (2018, methodology): “Fourth, we perform a triangulation method to test for potential publication bias in our HOMA analyses (Harrison et al., 2017).”
- Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (2016, methodology): “Triangulation approaches in research use particular methods to compensate for weaknesses in other designs (e.g., Harrison et al. 2014; Rogelberg and Laber 2002).”