Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices

By G. Banks, James G. Field, F. Oswald, Ernest H. O’Boyle, Ronald S. Landis, D. Rupp, Steven Rogelberg. Journal of business and psychology, 2018

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/592b9cfb4c03f41bbcf571a1523108bd94ff822c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Mikko Rönkkö

In Statistics and Probability

1. E. Aalto
2. Miguel I. Aguirre-Urreta
3. Kristina M. Reiss
4. Anselm R. Strohmaier
5. Mikko Rönkkö
6. Henni Tenhunen
7. Andreas Obersteiner

Citations in the corpus

• Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review (2020, result): “Apart from avoiding the risk of type I errors and post hoc hypotheses, limiting and specifying the to-be-used measures further helps to clarify, compare, and interpret the results (for a discussion of some of these considerations, see Banks et al., 2019).”
• Eight Simple Guidelines for Improved Understanding of Transformations and Nonlinear Effects (2021, background): “Fortunately, the field seems to be moving in this direction as prominent journals are making efforts to increase transparency in the empirical research process (Aguinis et al., 2018; Antonakis, Banks, et al., 2019; Banks et al., 2019; Bergh & Oswald, 2020; Chen, 2018; Grand et al., 2018).”