What Does It Take to Stand Up for the Victim of Bullying?: The Interplay Between Personal and Social Factors
By Virpi Pöyhönen, Jaana Juvonen, Christina Salmivalli. 2010
295 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dead99d9d48effe44e4b4e932854c9bd01d8253
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Christina Salmivalli
- E. Poskiparta
- Kay Bussey
- Kirstin Barchia
- J. Polanin
- Tiziana Pozzoli
- Gianluca Gini
- Antti Kärnä
In Safety Research
- Christina Salmivalli
- J. Polanin
- René Veenstra
- Kay Bussey
- Kirstin Barchia
- Gianluca Gini
- Harold D. Green Jr.
- T. Little
In Social Psychology
- Christina Salmivalli
- E. Poskiparta
- Dorothy Espelage
- J. Polanin
- Kay Bussey
- Antti Kärnä
- René Veenstra
- Gianluca Gini
Citations in the corpus
- Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors (2011, methodology): “Grade and gender were also controlled in correlational analyses and examined directly in regression analyses due to gender and grade differences found in prior research (e.g., Egan, Monson, & Perry, 1998; Hymel et al., 2005; Pöyhönen et al., 2010; Smith, Madsen, & Moody, 1999).”
- Why Do Bystanders of Bullying Help or Not? A Multidimensional Model (2013, background): “For example, defenders report good levels of self-efficacy beliefs in the domain of interpersonal relationships (Pöyhönen et al., 2010; Pöyhönen & Salmivalli, 2008) that are low in students who do not intervene (Gini et al., 2008).”
- Willingness to Intervene in Bullying Episodes Among Middle School Students (2012, background): “This lack of attention to peer group influences on bullying attitudes and behaviors is an unfortunate phenomenon because an individual student’s decision to defend a victim has been associated with peer-group norms (Gini et al., 2007; Pöyhönen et al., 2010), and prevention programs emphasize bystand”
- Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach (2011, background): “It has been suggested that a high status is a prerequisite of taking sides with the victims, due to the social risks involved in defending behaviors (Pöyhönen et al., 2010).”
- A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4-6. (2011, background): “With a new self-efficacy for defending scale (Pöyhönen et al., 2010), students evaluated how easy or difficult it would be for them to defend and support the victim of bullying.”