A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4-6.

By Antti Kärnä, M. Voeten, T. Little, E. Poskiparta, A. Kaljonen, Christina Salmivalli. Child Development, 2011

673 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Plant Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63830207fa515dfe5ffcbff02ff4d391a5191d54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Plant Science

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Bystanders Matter: Associations Between Reinforcing, Defending, and the Frequency of Bullying Behavior in Classrooms (2011, methodology): “The details regarding the recruitment of schools are provided in Kärnä et al. (2011).”
The Longitudinal Interplay between Bullying, Victimization, and Social Status: Age-related and Gender Differences (2015, methodology): “We used data collected for the KiVa antibullying program evaluation in two different cohorts covering either grades 3–6 or grades 7–9 (see Kärnä et al., 2011, 2013, for details on recruitment and the intervention program).”
A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015, background): “For example, Kärnä et al. (2011) reported a reduction in peer and self-reported bullying in a sample of over 4000 Finish students.”
Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying (2012, background): “A ‘whole school approach’ for preventing traditional bullying may also be effective in preventing cyberbullying, promoting a school climate where aggressive dynamics are rejected (Kärnä et al. 2011).”
Moral Disengagement About Cyberbullying and Parental Monitoring: Effects on Traditional Bullying and Victimization via Cyberbullying Involvement (2018, background): “Many traditional bullying prevention and intervention efforts have included a component aimed at increasing empathy and awareness of victims’ distress (Kärnä et al., 2011; Polanin, Espelage, & Pigott, 2012).”
Differential effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on popular and unpopular bullies (2014, background): “The evaluation of the programas awhole has shown it to be effective at reducing self- and peer-reported victimization as well as selfreported bullying among fourth- to sixth-graders (Kärnä et al., 2011).”
The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: implications for science, policy, and practice. (2012, background): “Developed in Finland, the KiVa program (Kärnä et al., 2011; Salmivalli, Kärnä, & Poskiparta, 2010) recognizes the functionality of bullying as a means of obtaining status and dominance.”
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Classroom Management Strategies and Classroom Management Programs on Students’ Academic, Behavioral, Emotional, and Motivational Outcomes (2016, methodology): “For antibullying programs that have been successfully implemented, see Kärnä et al. (2011).”