Heterogeneity and change in environmental strategy: Technological and political responses to climate change in the global automobile industry

By David L. Levy, Sandra Rothenberg. 2002

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/487510d51008cfe5b0ace68b851fcba41ccbe182

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Olivier Boiral
2. C. Okereke
3. D. Russel
4. F. Fortanier
5. D. Egan
6. L. Vigneau

Citations in the corpus

• The Dynamic Between Firms' Environmental Strategies and Institutional Constraints in Emerging Economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan (2005, unknown): “This finding is consistent with that of other research (e.g. Dowell et al., 2000; Jaffe et al., 1995; Levy and Rothenberg 2002).”
• A Neo‐Gramscian Approach to Corporate Political Strategy: Conflict and Accommodation in the Climate Change Negotiations* (2003, background): “Levy and Rothenberg (2002) develop this notion and argue that automobile companies are members of multiple fields exerting competing pressures, and that organizational fields can sustain multiple competing practices and discursive forms.”
• Harmonization in CSR Reporting (2011, background): “However, isomorphic pulls can be very diffuse because the organizational field is not a homogeneous construct (Levy and Rothenberg 2002) and the boundary of a field is often difficult to establish (Westney 1993).”
• Market Strategies for Climate Change (2004, background): “In the automotive and oil industries, companies from European countries changed positions much earlier than their US counterparts (Kolk and Levy, 2001; Kolk and Levy, 2004; Levy and Rothenberg, 2002).”
• Regulatory Pressure and Competitive Dynamics: Carbon Management Strategies of UK Energy-Intensive Companies (2010, background): “Accordingly, an appreciation of the complex interactions between competitive dynamics and regulatory pressure—as well as the need to respond to wider societal pressures generated by NGOs—is important in explaining the character of corporate strategic response to climate change.(48) Without strong po”
• Multinationals' Political Activities on Climate Change (2007, background): “…attention recently (Hoffman, 2005; Kolk & Pinkse, 2005), political strategies have played a role all along (cf. Baron, 1995), although the intensity and the contents have changed—from antagonistic to more cooperative in many cases (Kolk, 2001; Levy & Kolk, 2002; Levy & Rothenberg, 2002).”
• Global Warming: Should Companies Adopt a Proactive Strategy? (2006, background): “Such is the case of Ford and General Motors, who recently withdrew from the Global Climate Coalition opposing the enforcement of limits on GHG emissions.(23) The same move was made several years earlier by Shell and BP, who had backed this coalition before supporting the Kyoto Protocol and embarking”
• Bargains Old and New: Multinational Corporations in Global Governance (2003, unknown): “Levy and Rothenberg (2002).”