A Neo‐Gramscian Approach to Corporate Political Strategy: Conflict and Accommodation in the Climate Change Negotiations*

By David L. Levy, D. Egan. 2003

567 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b69f0ffb869e80886189231130427d1cc8c566d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Political Dynamics of Sustainable Coffee: Contested Value Regimes and the Transformation of Sustainability (2016, unknown): “This work draws from Gramsci’s key concept of hegemony as consensual stability of dominant groups in modern capitalist societies (Fontana, 2006; Levy and Egan, 2003), which is achieved, despite inequalities, with a measure of economic and political accommodation with subordinate groups, and through ”
Corporate Responses in an Emerging Climate Regime: The Institutionalization and Commensuration of Carbon Disclosure (2008, methodology): “…groups were created, such as the Global Climate Coalition (GCC) and the Climate Council, which directed their energies toward preventing an international regime to impose caps on GHG emissions, and played a major role in preventing the USA from joining the Kyoto Protocol (Levy and Egan, 2003).”
Asset Divestment as a Response to Media Attacks in Stigmatized Industries (2014, background): “…studies have sought to understand how firms strategize in such contested industries such as private military contracting (Baum and McGahan, 2013), big oil (Levy and Egan, 2003), big box retailing (Yue, Rao, and Ingram, 2013), and tobacco and gambling (Galvin, Ventresca, and Hudson, 2004).”
The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy (2017, background): “A second set of studies has chosen a particular theoretical lens merely to interpret climate change impact mitigation challenges (Kamieniecki, 2006; Levy & Egan, 2003; Levy & Newell, 2003; McCright & Dunlap, 2000, 2003; Pattberg & Stripple, 2008).”
Political Contestation in Global Production Networks (2008, background): “Consent thus rests on strategic acquiescence as much as ideological domination (Levy & Egan, 2003; Przeworski & Wallerstein, 1982).”
Market Strategies for Climate Change (2004, background): “Others followed rather reluctantly, merely preparing to comply with expected regulation (Kolk, 2000; Levy and Egan, 2003; O’Neill Packard and Reinhardt, 2000).”
Overcoming Inaction through Collective Institutional Entrepreneurship: Insights from Regime Theory (2007, background): “Instead of leveraging incentives or power, actors create common ground and coincident interpretations by promoting overriding values that all accept (Levy and Egan 2003), heightening actor awareness of their interdependence and paving the way for a collaborative strategy of engagement.”
Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations (2014, background): “Social movements seek to bring about change through redefining the dominant field frame, spreading familiarity and acceptance of this alternative frame, and generating political pressure to implement institutional change (Levy and Egan 2003: 805–806).”
Multinational enterprises and climate change: Exploring institutional failures and embeddedness (2011, background): “…case shows that hostcountry MNEs did not suffer that much from a possible liability of foreignness, but rather were able to profit from disadvantages that domestic firms faced as “insiders”, also because the latter had opposed mandatory climate change regulation for a long time (Levy & Egan, 2003).”