Bargains Old and New: Multinational Corporations in Global Governance

By David L. Levy, Aseem Prakash. Business and Politics, 2003

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects (2010, background): “Because of this and the possible systematization of environmental risks (Figge, 2005) the responses by multinational corporations in terms of corporate social responsibility, corporate citizenship environmental management or corporate governance became a focus of attention in parallel to processes o”
The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy (2017, background): “Coupling such “sensemaking” with more structured contacts facilitates convergence toward the typically higher standards of dominant sector companies (Levy & Prakash, 2003).”
Making environmental law for the market: the emergence, character, and implications of Chile's environmental regime (2011, background): “They describe market-enabling regimes as those that ‘tend to reduce transaction costs and provide collective goods important to MNCs [multinational corporations], such as standards, multilateral recognition, and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights’ (Levy and Prakash 2003, p.136).”
Resource Nationalism, Bargaining and International Oil Companies: Challenges and Change in the New Millennium (2009, unknown): “Unsurprisingly, the obsolescing bargaining model was declared to have outlived its usefulness during this period (Eden and Lenway 2001; Ramamurti 2001; Eden and Appel Molot 2002; Levy and Prakash 2003).”