Market Strategies for Climate Change

By Ans Kolk, J. Pinkse. 2004

396 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/133f631c49d086e944d9b98738a92599371162af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Carbon Disclosure, Contextual Factors, and Information Asymmetry: The Case of Physical Risk Reporting (2018, background): “For example, firms operating in high-emitting industries, such as cement or electricity production, typically have a large carbon footprint, making the companies in this sector susceptible to regulatory and market-related climate risks (Kolk & Pinkse, 2004, 2007; Sprengel & Busch, 2011).”
Does the carbon market help or hurt the stock price of electricity companies? Further evidence from the European context (2016, background): “…due to the increased business risk for the non-compliance to the Kyoto reduction commitment by the electricity sector (Busch & Hoffmann, 2007; Kolk & Pinkse, 2004), which results in higher expected returns by the investors in electricity 2 The grandfathering allowance approach is defined in…”
Convergence in Environmental Reporting: Assessing the Carbon Disclosure Project (2013, background): “Previous research has demonstrated wide variations in strategic decision-making of firms related to carbon disclosure (Kolk and Pinske, 2004; Kolk and Pinske, 2005), carbon management (Kolk and Pinske, 2004; Kolk and Pinske, 2005; Sullivan, 2009), and investment in energy-efficient technologies (Hof”
Modeling the Impacts of Corporate Commitment on Climate Change (2012, background): “In contrast, in countries that have not ratified the Kyoto Protocol or put in place substantive measures to address emissions, companies appear more inclined to adopt a ‘wait and see’ approach (Kolk and Pinkse, 2004, 2007a; Pinkse, 2007).”
Multinationals' Political Activities on Climate Change (2007, background): “It has been observed that the climate change issue induces many firms to act collectively and cooperate with governments, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), or other firms (Kolk & Pinkse, 2004).”
The Drivers of Corporate Climate Change Strategies and Public Policy (2017, background): “A relatively recent literature based on empirical data has emerged to classify firm-level responses to climate change (Cogan, 2006; Kolk & Pinkse, 2004, 2005, 2007).”
Sustainability indexes: why join in? A study of the ‘Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE)’ in Brazil (2015, background): “Often, they join alliances and initiatives with other organizations not only to learn but also to develop technologies, processes or products (Kolk and Pinkse, 2004; Jeswani et al., 2008).”
Climate change accounting research: keeping it interesting and different (2011, background): “…Levy, 2001; Levy and Egan, 2003; Livesey, 2002), businesses are now engaging in various programmes, with measures, targets and market trading (e.g., Kolk and Pinkse, 2004, 2005; Begg et al., 2005; Hoffman, 2006; Pinkse and Kolk, 2009), spawning business interest in strategy, opportunities and…”
Global Warming: Should Companies Adopt a Proactive Strategy? (2006, background): “Au th or 's pe rs on al co py Kolk and Pinkse point out that these effects on innovation may depend on the vertical and horizontal integration of organisations.(4) They may also depend on the country of origin and decisions by managers to change the products or processes emitting GHG rather than buy”
New Partnerships in Global Environmental Policy: The Clean Development Mechanism (2004, background): “It had argued for geographic flexibility in meeting the commitments to avoid broader international economic measures such as a carbon tax, which it saw as causing unacceptable damage to its economy (Grubb, Vrolijk, & Brack, 1999; Kolk & Pinkse, 2004).”
Business and Climate Change: The Climate Response of the World's 30 Largest Corporations (2009, background): “…opposing emission caps and regulation), opportunistic/hesitant (preparing for regulation, but demonstrating caution about the issue publicly), or offensive (arguing that companies need to take the first step, while also believing that they would profit from such action) (Kolk & Pinkse, 2004).”