Organizational Commitment of Teachers in Urban Schools

By Jay R. Dee, Alan B. Henkin, C. Singleton. 2006

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4600b4cbc537fd7eaea77cf8d982d282bce82119

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. G. Devos
2. Chang Zhu
3. Martin Valcke
4. Diya Dou
5. Hester Hulpia
6. Hilde Van Keer
7. Sukkyung You
8. Yves Rosseel

Citations in the corpus

• The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers' and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment (2009, background): “Higher levels of organizational commitment and job satisfaction result in more effort and an increased dedication to attain organizational goals, which is closely related to organizational effectiveness (Dee et al., 2006).”
• Teachers’ Commitment and psychological well-being: implications of self-beliefs for teaching in Hong Kong (2015, unknown): “…number of studies concerning teacher commitment have been conducted (see, for example, Abd Razak, Darmawan, & Keeves, 2010; Chan, Lau, Nie, Lim, & Hogan, 2008; Choi & Tang, 2009; Dee et al., 2006; Henkin & Holliman, 2009; Sezgin, 2009; Shin & Reyes, 1991).”
• The Influence of Distributed Leadership on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment: A Multilevel Approach (2009, background): “A substantial body of research has indicated that higher levels of organizational commitment result in more effort and increased dedication to attain organizational goals, which is closely related to organizational effectiveness (Dee et al., 2006).”
• The Relation Between School Leadership From a Distributed Perspective and Teachers’ Organizational Commitment (2011, background): “Organizational commitment of teachers is a key mechanism for organizational effectiveness and plays an (indirect) role in student outcomes (Dee et al., 2006; Rosenholtz, 1985).”
• Key influences on special education teachers’ intentions to leave (2017, background): “According to these authors, commitment does not reflect passive loyalty but instead ‘involves an active relationship with the organization such that individuals are willing to give something of themselves’ (Mowday et al., 1982: 27; see also Dee et al., 2006).”
• The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment (2017, background): “Teachers’ job satisfaction, independently or in interaction with other factors, has a variety of consequences on both teacher attitudes and teacher behavior (Beck and Murphy, 1998; Dee et al., 2006; Fullan and Watson, 2000).”
• Teacher perceptions of school culture and their organizational commitment and well-being in a Chinese school (2011, background): “The latter two variables are considered as important predictors of organizational effectiveness and improvement (Shann 1998; Dee et al. 2006; Ostroff 1992).”
• Drivers of hospitality industry employees' job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job performance (2010, background): “Dee et al. (2006) suggested that organizational commitment is a person’s intention to devote to and be loyal to the organization. Lambert et al. (2006) suggested that organizational commitment is the structural phenomenon of trading between individuals and organizations. It increases with time, but ”