Issue contingencies and marketers' recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions

By Tim Barnett, S. Valentine. 2004

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/456e771b5c7112c7cfe0c23431d0cb7b9324d607

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The impact of salesperson customer orientation on the evaluation of a salesperson’s ethical treatment, trust in the salesperson, and intentions to purchase (2015, background): “In addition, traditional ethical decision-making models and supporting research show ethical attitudes as precursors to behavioral intent (Barnett and Valentine 2004; Jones 1991; Rest 1986), lending support to the notion that studies involving the effects of selling approach in ethical contexts,…”
The Impact of Ethical Ideologies, Moral Intensity, and Social Context on Sales-Based Ethical Reasoning (2011, background): “Previous studies show that these steps are positively related (Barnett and Valentine, 2004; Fleischman et al., 2007; Singhapakdi et al., 1996, 1999, 2000; Valentine and Barnett, 2007; Valentine et al., 2010), and that the various stages are influenced by a variety of factors found within…”
Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-making: An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Accounting and Business Students (2009, background): “Findings, however, have been inconclusive on the relative importance of these dimensions and Barnett and Valentine (2004) suggested that one of the reasons for this may be differences in the moral development of the samples used.”
Are Audit-related Ethical Decisions Dependent upon Mood? (2006, background): “For example, Jones (1991) states that moral intensity is central to ethical decision making while Barnett and Valentine (2004) found that the moral intensity factor Jones defined as magnitude of consequences demonstrated the strongest relationship with the ethical decision-making process in two…”
Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis (2012, background): “Other studies report no significant relationship between age and ethical judgments (e.g., Barnett and Valentine, 2004; Schepers, 2003).”
The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making (2016, background): “Previous empirical research on temporal immediacy has been limited and yielded mixed results, with some studies finding that it has little or no association with the ethical decision-making process (Barnett 2001; Barnett and Valentine 2004) and others that it is associated significantly with ethical”
The Impact of Perceived Ethical Culture of the Firm and Demographic Variables on Auditors’ Ethical Evaluation and Intention to Act Decisions (2010, background): “…linkages between these two components of Rest’s model have been found to apply in audit (e.g. Shafer et al., 1999, 2001) and non-audit settings (e.g. Barnett and Valentine, 2004; May and Pauli, 2002), little testing of the model has been carried out in the context of the types of auditor…”
Impact of Ethical Leadership and Leader–Member Exchange on Whistle Blowing: The Moderating Impact of the Moral Intensity of the Issue (2011, background): “In line with Barnett and Valentine (2004) , we conceptualize MOCs as the degree of harm that results from a given action.”