Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-making: An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Accounting and Business Students

By Breda Sweeney, Fiona Costello. 2009

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54152f72ab8bb53e8633715112c5f59f9dc898af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. A. Musbah
2. David A. Tyfa
3. C. Cowton
4. Jana L. Craft

In General Health Professions

1. Jana L. Craft
2. A. Musbah
3. David A. Tyfa
4. Martha C. Andrews
5. C. Cowton

In Information Systems and Management

1. A. Musbah
2. David A. Tyfa
3. C. Cowton
4. Jana L. Craft
5. Thomas L. Baker
6. Martha C. Andrews
7. Tammy G. Hunt
8. S. Valentine

Citations in the corpus

• A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011 (2013, background): “Sweeney and Costello 2009 AE Of the components of moral intensity, the relationships with the three stages of ethical decision- making were weakest for proximity.”
• Values and person‐organization fit: Does moral intensity strengthen outcomes? (2011, background): “The construct of moral intensity has received limited research attention and much of what has been done has used student samples (e.g. Wasieleski and Hayibor, 2008; Ng et al., 2009; Sweeney and Costello, 2009).”
• The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making (2016, methodology): “As in the case of much previous research (Leitsch 2006; May and Pauli 2002; McMahon and Harvey 2006; O’Leary and Stewart 2007; Sweeney and Costello 2009; Valentine and Hollingworth 2012; Valentine et al. 2013; Yang and Wu 2009), single-item scales were used to measure the three stages of ethical dec”