Incremental Validity of Empirically Keyed Biodata Scales over GMA and the Five Factor Personality Constructs

By M. K. Mount, L. Witt, Murray R. Barrick. 2000

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/445cdc922b7e7ae18973ea82624c6a40f752b080

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Filip Lievens
2. Deniz S. Ones
3. Patrick M. Wright
4. D. Turban
5. J. Mowen
6. Arthur Poropat
7. Timo Gnambs

In Clinical Psychology

1. Eric G. Harris
2. J. Mowen
3. J. Licata
4. Tom J Brown
5. P. Sackett
6. Filip Lievens
7. M. McCulloch
8. Deniz S. Ones

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Filip Lievens
2. P. Sackett
3. Deniz S. Ones
4. W. Boswell
5. Patrick M. Wright
6. D. Turban

Citations in the corpus

• Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research (2002, background): “Page 35 practices A, B, and C, should be observed for one system and practices D, E, and F for another. While intuitively appealing, the research has failed so far to observe consistent differences that can form the basis for a stable typology. Another approach to horizontal fit, however, deals not ”
• On the trait antecedents and outcomes of service worker job resourcefulness: A hierarchical model approach (2003, methodology): “The attractiveness of using 5-Factor models has been enhanced by findings indicating that (1) the traits explain high levels of variance in performance (more than just biodata and general mental ability) ( Mount, Witt, and Barrick 2000 ), (2) the traits are stable over time (Judge, Higgins, Thoresen”
• How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation (2010, unknown): “…Performance O, C, E, A, N Mount et al, 1998 Task/Technical/Overall Performance O, C, E, A, N Mount et al, 1999 Task/Technical/Overall Performance C Mount et al, 2000 Task/Technical/Overall Performance, OCB/Contextual Performance O, C, E, A, N Neuman & Kickul, 1998 OCB/Contextual Performance C, E,…”
• Personality at Work: Raising Awareness and Correcting Misconceptions (2005, background): “Broader theories of personality traits in IWO psychology have been offered by Judge and colleagues for core self-evaluations (Judge & Bono, 2001; Judge, Bono, Erez, Locke, & Thoresen, 2002; Judge, Van Vianen, & De Pater, 2004), by Ones and her colleagues (Hogan & Ones, 1997; Ones & Viswesvaran, 1996”
• Personnel selection. (2008, background): “A range of primary studies has also examined the incremental contribution to validity of one or more newer predictors over one or more established predictors (e.g., Clevenger et al. 2001, Lievens et al. 2003, Mount et al. 2000).”
• Using Person–Organization Fit to Select Employees for High-Turnover Jobs (2007, background): “Although several recent studies have investigated the incremental validity over cognitive ability of various selection predictors, such as biodata and personality (e.g., Cortina, Goldstein, Payne, Davison, & Gilliland, 2000; Mount et al., 2000), we found no study that included P–”