Contingent and Non‐Contingent Working in Local Government: Contrasting Psychological Contracts

By Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro, I. Kessler. 2002

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41001fd07349ec8ed05a3370e12c9286ffb60e83

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Joerg Felfe
2. Sue R. Faerman
3. B. Schyns
4. D. Shim
5. A. Hirschi
6. F. Franke
7. J. Wombacher

In Public Administration

1. Joerg Felfe
2. Sue R. Faerman
3. D. Shim
4. J. Wombacher
5. F. Franke

Citations in the corpus

• Does the Form of Employment Make a Difference?--Commitment of Traditional, Temporary, and Self-Employed Workers. (2008, background): “While there are some studies that focus on organizational commitment of temporary workers (e.g., Connelly, Gallagher, & Gilley, 2007; Coyle-Shapiro & Kessler, 2002; Coyle-Shapiro & Morrow, 2006; Guest, 2004; Sverke, Gallagher, & Hellgren, 1999), only a few reflect on the commitment to new forms of…”
• Government Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Impacts of Public Service Motivation, Organizational Identification, and Subjective OCB Norms (2017, background): “…and examined the influence of such variables as job satisfaction, justice perception, and perceived supervisory support as important predictors (e.g., Alotaibi 2001; Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler 2002; Coyle-Shapiro, Morrow, and Kessler 2006), the impacts of those variables have been moderate at best.”
• Literature Review of Theory and Research on the Psychological Impact of Temporary Employment: Towards a Conceptual Model (2008, unknown): “2002; Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler 2002; De Cuyper and De Witte 2006, 2007a, in press; De Cuyper et al. in press; Guest 2004; Millward and Brewerton 1999, 2000; Millward and Hopkins 1998; Rousseau 1995; Van Dyne and Ang 1998) argue that the psychological contract of temporary workers compared with…”
• Doing more with less? Employee reactions to psychological contract breach via target similarity or spillover during public sector organizational change (2014, unknown): “As argued above, public sector employment was characterized as relatively secure in the past but this has become less the case over the last two decades (Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler, 2002).”
• How satisfied are they and why? A study of job satisfaction, job rewards, gender and temporary agency workers in Australia (2010, unknown): “This argument is echoed by other non-standard work scholars, who argue that non-standard workers do not expect as much as permanent workers and, thus, perceive greater organizational support and are more responsive to higher numbers of inducements (e.g. Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler, 2002).”
• Flexible Employment Contracts, the Psychological Contract and Employee Outcomes: An Analysis and Review of the Evidence (2004, unknown): “This was confirmed by Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler (2002), cited earlier, who also found that temporary workers engaged in fewer citizenship behaviours. However, they were more likely to increase their citizenship behaviours, compared with permanent employees, if they reported higher levels of organiza”