Developments in understanding Chinese leadership: paternalism and its elaborations, moderations, and alternatives
By Chao-chuan Chen, Jiing-Lih Farh. 2010
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/407b5ba6148b913bc9d0deae50583a41a68b517f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Integrating Knowledge Activities for Team Innovation: Effects of Transformational Leadership (2018, background): “However, as argued by C. C. Chen and Farh (2010), transformational leadership is compatible to the Chinese collective and leader-centric values, and empirical work on transformational leadership in the Chinese context has demonstrated its utility in predicting workplace outcomes (Kirkman, Chen,…”
- Managing talent in emerging economy multinationals: integrating strategic management and human resource management (2018, background): “…example, Chinese organizations have traditionally been very hierarchical and paternalistic (Farh, Liang, Chou, & Cheng, 2008), with a high power distance culture (Cheng, Chou, Wu, Huang, & Farh, 2004; Chen & Farh, 2010) and extensive reliance on personal relationships (Bu & Roy, 2015; Leung, 2014).”
- Paternalistic Leadership in Four East Asian Societies (2014, background): “Email: diana.boer@gmx.net Paternalistic leadership is one dominant leadership style in Asia (Chan, Huang, Snape, & Lam, 2012; C. C. Chen & Farh, 2010; Cheng, Chou, Wu, Huang, & Farh, 2004; X. P. Chen, Eberly, Chiang, Farh, & Cheng, 2011; M. Wu, Huang, Li, & Liu, 2012).”
- Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning (2019, unknown): “The agentic perspective is consistent with Confucian thought on leadership as co-constructed and dialectic rather than unidirectional (C. C. Chen & Farh, 2010), and matches existing commentaries regarding the development of more autonomous learners within this cultural context (Littlewood, 1999).”