The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation

By Mark Felton. 2004

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f7cc9b384eb7882fbe03357d3b2eb328aa18d37

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

Developing Norms of Argumentation: Metacognitive, Epistemological, and Social Dimensions of Developing Argumentive Competence (2013, unknown): “Efforts toward this end have met with some success (Asterhan & Schwarz, 2007, 2009; Berland & McNeill, 2010; Bricker & Bell, 2011; Felton, 2004; Iordanou, 2010; Jimenez-Aleixandre & Erduran, 2008; Kuhn & Udell, 2003; Kuhn, Goh, Iordanou, & Shaenfield, 2008; Nussbaum, 2008; Nussbaum & Edwards, 2011;…”
Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument (2007, background): “Several recent studies (Felton, 2004; Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Kuhn & Udell, 2003) provide evidence indicating that younger and less skilled arguers concentrate argumentive discourse on arguments that support their own position, paying relatively little attention to the claims and arguments of their…”
What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? An Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education (2013, methodology): “Subsequent analytical coding schemes have been proposed for this reason, either by Kuhn and her colleagues (e.g., Felton, 2004; Felton & Kuhn, 2001) or by researchers in the field of CSCL (e.g., Andriessen, Erkens, van de Laak, Peters, & Coirier, 2003; De Vries, Lund, & Baker, 2002).”
Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? (2008, background): “The study follows a line of work devoted to fostering the development of argumentation skills in early adolescents based on engagement and practice in argumentive discourse (Felton, 2004; Kuhn, Shaw, & Felton, 1997; Kuhn & Udell, 2003; Kuhn, Goh, Iordanou, & Shaenfield, 2008; Udell, 2007).”
Why Argue? Developing Understanding of the Purposes and Values of Argumentive Discourse (2010, unknown): “…Weinberger, & Erkens, 2007; Driver, Newton, & Osborne, 2000; Duschl & Osborne, 2002; Erduran & Jimenez-Aleixandre, 2007; Erduran & Simon, 2004; Felton, 2004; Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Iordanou, 2010; Kuhn, in press; Kuhn, Goh, Iordanou, & Shaenfield, 2008; Kuhn & Udell, 2003, 2007; Maloney &…”
Cognitive Foundations of Learning Argumentation (2007, background): “Despite the methodological difficulties (see Erduran, this book) that this analysis carries, there are several studies that show the benefits of participation in social dialogic argumentation in students’ individual arguments, thanks to the externalization that discursive practices require ( Felton,”
Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-year Intervention Study (2014, methodology): “1 Coding was based on a coding scheme used in previous research (Author, 2001; Felton, 2004; Kuhn et al., 2008; Kuhn & Udell, 2003; Udell, 2007).”
Supporting Use of Evidence in Argumentation through Practice in Argumentation and Reflection in the Context of SOCRATES Learning Environment (2015, background): “employment of counterargument strategies supported the development of participants‘ counterargument and rebuttal strategies (Felton, 2004), and extends previous work by showing that reflective activities focused on evidence use in argumentation, along with engagement in argumentation, can support pa”
Teaching and Learning Argumentative Reading and Writing: A Review of Research (2011, background): “Although some researchers (Felton, 2004; Felton & Herko, 2004; Kuhn & Crowell, in press; Kuhn, Goh, Iordanou, & Shaenfield, 2008; Kuhn & Udell, 2003) do not frame their intervention research using Bakhtinian theory, their rather consistent successes with efforts to support early adolescents in atten”