Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument

By Deanna Kuhn, Wadiya Udell. 2007

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b8e1988b8747e2e7c2c045e645364e360b3b535

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Why Argue? Developing Understanding of the Purposes and Values of Argumentive Discourse (2010, background): “…Newton, & Osborne, 2000; Duschl & Osborne, 2002; Erduran & Jimenez-Aleixandre, 2007; Erduran & Simon, 2004; Felton, 2004; Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Iordanou, 2010; Kuhn, in press; Kuhn, Goh, Iordanou, & Shaenfield, 2008; Kuhn & Udell, 2003, 2007; Maloney & Simon, 2006; Nussbaum, 2005; Udell, 2007).”
Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? (2008, background): “Studies by Kuhn and colleagues and others (Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Kuhn, 1993; Kuhn & Udell, 2003, 2007; Mason & Scirica, 2006) have emphasized engagement in dialogic argument as a vehicle for coming to recognize and value its role in knowledge construction, the topic we turn to in the next section.”
Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories (2016, background): “Premature consensus seeking (e.g., Weinberger & Fischer, 2006) and a tendency to ignore dissenting claims (Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Kuhn & Udell, 2007) are common concerns in argumentation research.”
Relational Reasoning and Its Manifestations in the Educational Context: a Systematic Review of the Literature (2013, background): “The ability to conceptualize antithetical opposition is important for argument and persuasion (Chinn and Anderson 1998; Kuhn and Udell 2007) and conceptual change with refutation text (Broughton et al. 2010).”
What Needs to Develop in the Development of Inquiry Skills? (2008, background): “Like skills of inquiry, skills of argument are ones that must be engaged and developed; they are far from intuitive (Kuhn & Udell, 2003, 2007; Kuhn et al., 2008).”
Reading Into the Future: Competence for the 21st Century (2012, background): “Antithetical reasoning is central to the work done in argumentation and in persuasion (Felton & Kuhn, 2001; Kuhn & Udell, 2001, 2007).”
Framing for scientific argumentation (2012, background): “This shift is emphasized in D. Kuhn’s recent work (2010; Kuhn & Udell, 2007) in which she investigated the ‘‘cognitive challenges’’ facing students when they participate in argumentative discourse in a context designed to elicit their nascent argumentation abilities, rather than in decontextualized…”