The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction
By Keith M. Hmieleski, Andrew C. Corbett. 2008
441 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3aa67248afe61cbba8aaee07a0fafc78dbf5e7e2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Robert A. Baron
- Melissa S. Cardon
- Keith M. Hmieleski
- Philipp Sieger
- Tommaso Minola
- J. Haynie
- Andranik Tumasjan
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Melissa S. Cardon
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- D. Kuratko
- Michael H. Morris
- M. Obschonka
- J. Haynie
- Keith M. Hmieleski
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Melissa S. Cardon
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Robert A. Baron
- Michael H. Morris
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- D. Kuratko
- Charles Y. Murnieks
- M. Obschonka
Citations in the corpus
- In Pursuit of Greatness: CEO Narcissism, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Firm Performance Variance (2013, neutral): “The importance of sales as a meaningful dependent variable in the case of small firms has been previously theorized (Chandler et al., 2009; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2008).”
- Framing the Entrepreneurial Experience (2012, background): “Ireland, Hitt, and Sirmon (2003) define this mind-set as the ability to sense, adapt, and react under conditions of uncertainty.”
- Perceived progress variability and entrepreneurial effort intensity: The moderating role of venture goal commitment (2015, background): “We controlled for self-efficacy (α=.89) because it impacts effort outcomes (Bandura, 1982; Silver et al., 1995) and has been shown as a potent variable in individual-level entrepreneurship research (e.g., Hmieleski and Baron, 2008; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2008).”
- The Long‐Term Impact of Entrepreneurial Self‐Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Venture Performance (2019, background): “A number of studies have also reported that an entrepreneurs’ self-efficacy is positively associated with their firm’s growth (Baum and Locke 2004; Baum, Locke, and Smith 2001; Hmieleski and Baron 2008; Hmieleski and Corbett 2008).”
- Entrepreneurial self‐efficacy and business start‐up: developing a multi‐dimensional definition (2010, methodology): “More recently, Byrant (2007) explored the role of self-efficacy in the use of decision making heuristics by entrepreneurs and Hmieleski and Corbett (2008) explored a moderating role of self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur’s satisfaction.”
- Creativity, self-efficacy, and small-firm performance: the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation (2015, background): “Third, self-efficacy and performance are not mediated by EO, but are directly associated with it, which emphasizes the important role of entrepreneurs’ beliefs in their ability to increase firm performance (Baum et al. 2001; Baum and Locke 2004; Hmieleski and Baron 2008; Hmieleski and Corbett 2008).”
- A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset (2010, background): “Entrepreneurial outcomes can be represented as opportunity discovery (Shane, 2000; Shane and Venkataraman, 2000), a speedy decision (Alvarez and Busenitz, 2001; Eisenhardt, 1989), or substantially growing the firm (Hmieleski and Corbett, 2008; Wiklund and Shepherd, 2003).”
- Developing Attitudes Toward an Entrepreneurial Career Through Mentoring (2015, methodology): “The selected career choice satisfaction measure is the one recently used in an entrepreneurship context (see Hmieleski & Corbett, 2008).”
- Self-Efficacy: Conditioning the Entrepreneurial Mindset (2009, methodology): “While the improvisation–performance relationship is positively moderated, the improvisation– satisfaction relationship is negatively moderated, which opens up further avenues of research on interaction effects ( Hmieleski and Corbett 2008 ).”
- The Family's Financial Support as a “Poisoned Gift”: A Family Embeddedness Perspective on Entrepreneurial Intentions (2017, result): “…consider intention theories such as the theory of planned behavior (TPB) (Ajzen 1991), which is in line with numerous other studies (e.g., Hmieleski and Corbett 2006; Schroeder et al. 2011; Virick, Basu, and Rogers 2015; Walter, Parboteeah, and Walter 2013; Wilson, Kickul and Marlino…”
- How does microfinance enhance entrepreneurial outcomes in emerging economies? The mediating mechanisms of psychological and social capital (2014, background): “A number of studies have found a positive relationship between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and both new venture growth and performance (Adekunle, 2011; Baum and Locke, 2003; Baum et al., 2001; Chandler and Jansen, 1992; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2008; Segal et al., 2005).”
- Regulatory focus and new venture performance: A study of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation under conditions of risk versus uncertainty (2008, background): “In such environments, fl exibility, rather than persistence or calculated analyses, may be the crucial overall approach to manage uncertainty (Baker and Nelson, 2005; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2008).”
- A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Uncertainty and Business Opportunity Identification: Exploration as a Mediator and Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as a Moderator (2017, background): “Finally, this study extends previous work on the role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy (e.g., Hmieleski & Baron, 2008; Hmieleski & Corbett, 2008; Tumasjan & Braun, 2012; Zhao et al., 2005) by examining its function as a boundary condition that determines why early-stage entrepreneurs differ in…”
- Gender and entrepreneurial self-efficacy: a learning perspective (2014, background): “Additional research reveals that those with higher ESE are more likely to initiate and persist with actual behaviours related to venture creation (Anna et al., 1999; Baum et al., 2001; Baum and Locke, 2004; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2008; Sequeira et al., 2007).”
- Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background (2011, result): “Although the personality- and traitbased streams of research have produced few noteworthy results (Gartner, 1989a), our study adds to recent calls not to abandon elements of the person (Schjoedt and Shaver, 2007; Hmieleski and Corbett, 2008; Hmieleski and Baron, 2009).”