A dialectical theory of the decision to go to work: Bringing together absenteeism and presenteeism

By Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben, Marilyn V. Whitman, Wayne S. Crawford. 2014

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a50d7dd2b212a3564aa611065b6ef5570aa9846

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. M. Karanika-Murray
2. C. Biron
3. C. Dietz
4. Aristides I. Ferreira
5. Luis F. Martinez
6. G. Johns
7. K. Nielsen

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. M. Karanika-Murray
2. C. Biron
3. Luis F. Martinez
4. Aristides I. Ferreira
5. Stig Vinberg
6. Mariella Miraglia
7. H. Breitsohl
8. G. Johns

Citations in the corpus

• The health-performance framework of presenteeism: Towards understanding an adaptive behaviour (2020, background): “The adaptive purpose of presenteeism underlines our person-centred approach that describes the presentee as an agent in enacting the behaviour, either as a reaction to external demands outside his or her control or as a proactive initiative to control a situation (Cooper and Lu, 2016; Halbesleben et”
• “To work, or not to work, that is the question” – Recent trends and avenues for research on presenteeism (2020, background): “understanding of the experience or behaviour (Halbesleben et al., 2014).”