Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency.

455 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Orthographic Depth and Its Impact on Universal Predictors of Reading (2010, background): “Similarly, whereas some studies found that RAN was more important in transparent languages than in English (Georgiou et al., 2008; Mann & Wimmer, 2002), others reported equal influences across languages (Patel et al., 2004).”
Examining the Simple View of Reading in a Transparent Orthography: A Longitudinal Study From Kindergarten to Grade 3 (2016, background): “Rapid naming, on the other hand, is more closely linked to reading fluency than to decoding (e.g., Georgiou et al., 2008; Puolakanaho et al., 2007; Savage & Frederickson, 2005; Torppa, Georgiou, Salmi, Eklund, & Lyytinen, 2012).”
Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming as Longitudinal Predictors of Reading in Five Alphabetic Orthographies with Varying Degrees of Consistency (2018, result): “The results of the current study also confirm earlier evidence that RAN is the best predictor of reading fluency across orthographies (e.g., Furnes & Samuelsson, 2009; Georgiou et al., 2008; Moll et al., 2014).”
Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: a longitudinal study (2010, background): “With respect to the role of RAN, the findings in this study have also suggested that RAN tends to play a more significant role in reading speed in Greek than in English ( Georgiou et al., 2008 ).”