The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams
By S. Carless, C. De Paola. 2000
478 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38970ccadc12e70a68bc7e1c8d532fcfb4fae8b4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arni Ahronson
- Paul E. Tesluk
- Artemis Chang
- Amanuel Tekleab
- Narda R. Quigley
- D. Beal
- B. Steijn
- J. Cameron
In Social Psychology
- Amanuel Tekleab
- Narda R. Quigley
- Paul E. Tesluk
- Arni Ahronson
- S. Warner
- Artemis Chang
- Matthew T. Bowers
- D. Beal
Citations in the corpus
- Team Dynamics: A Social Network Perspective (2012, background): “Previous research has indicated that task cohesion compared with social cohesion is more strongly correlated with work performance (Brawley, Carron, & Widmeyer, 1987; Carless & De Paola, 2000; Mullen & Copper, 1994; Williams & Widmeyer, 1991).”
- The Nature and Consequences of Group Cohesion in a Military Sample (2007, background): “According to Carron and Brawley (2000), ATG is a constellation of social perceptions held by individual team members that is associated with the manner in which the group satisfies personal needs and objectives.”
- A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship (2001, background): “Carless and DePaola (2000) did not find support for the four-factor structure.”
- Team innovation through collaboration: how visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion (2020, background): “Task commitment is the extent of ‘motivation towards achieving the organization’s goals and objectives’ (Carless and De Paola 2000, 73) and is according to Carless and De Paola more important for work outcomes than interpersonal attraction.”
- Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. (2003, background): “Considering the original emphasis of components in the cohesion construct and the continued emphasis on this approach (Carless & De Paola, 2000; Cota, Evans, Dion, Kilik, & Longman, 1995), Mullen and Copper's (1994, p. 224) conclusion, " that efforts to enhance group performance by fostering…”