Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations.
By D. Beal, Robin R. Cohen, Michael J. Burke, Christy L McLendon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003
1,347 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/685f508651465f37e6e4e15932f6a1acf8279066
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- John E. Mathieu
- Suzanne T. Bell
- Sharon K. Parker
- Steve W. J. Kozlowski
- Neil Anderson
- F. Morgeson
- Stephen E. Humphrey
- Murray R. Barrick
In Social Psychology
- John E. Mathieu
- Steve W. J. Kozlowski
- M. Maynard
- Lucy L. Gilson
- Suzanne T. Bell
- Tammy L. Rapp
- Leslie A. DeChurch
- Daniel R. Ilgen
Citations in the corpus
- Team innovation through collaboration: how visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion (2020, background): “Team cohesion is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct involving interpersonal attraction, task commitment, and group pride as its main dimensions (Beal et al. 2003).”
- Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. (2009, neutral): “Beal et al. (2003) discovered a similar pattern with cohesion and performance.”
- An empirical study of transformational leadership, team performance and service quality in retail banks (2011, background): “It is widely recognised as an important indicator of team-level processes with implications for teamwork processes and outcomes [49].”
- A Longitudinal Examination of the Relationship Between Team Leadership and Performance (2010, background): “Beal et al. (2003) reviewed the extant literature on cohesion and observed that several studies took a unidimensional view of cohesion, whereas many others explicated the independent contribution of its various components.”
- Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015, methodology): “It is multidimensional, with facets focused on task commitment, social relations, and group pride, although this latter facet has received far less research attention (Beal et al., 2003).”
- Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership (2008, neutral): “Meta-analytic results suggest that teams exhibiting low to moderate levels of task interdependency benefit less from social integration (Beal et al., 2003).”
- From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective (2013, background): “The performance dimensions, effectiveness and efficiency, are well known (Campbell 1990; Beal et al. 2003).”