Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity.
By Annett Schwamborn, Richard E. Mayer, Hubertina Thillmann, Claudia Leopold, Detlev Leutner. 2010
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/355befb39ae9417bd0fd95f2f3c74fd61bf1eb80
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Richard E. Mayer
- Logan Fiorella
- Detlev Leutner
- Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
- Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
- Annett Schmeck
- Maria Opfermann
- Vanessa D. I. Pfeiffer
Citations in the corpus
- Drawing pictures during learning from scientific text: testing the generative drawing effect and the prognostic drawing effect (2014, background): “Using cutout-figures (cf., Lesgold et al., 1975, 1977) or a drawing prompt (cf., Schwamborn et al., 2010) during drawing seems to provide sufficient constraints and leave enough cognitive capacities for learners to benefit from the drawing strategy.”
- Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning (2016, background): “…of students’ summaries (e.g., Hooper et al. 1994), explanations (e.g., Chi et al. 1989; Roscoe 2014), maps (e.g., Holley and Dansereau 1984), or drawings (e.g., Schwamborn et al. 2010)—and to analyze the time students spend learning and engaging in generative strategies (e.g., Selig et al. 2012).”
- Putting Education in “Educational” Apps (2015, background): “Ninth graders who generated drawings when reading about chemical processes outperformed those who only read (Schwamborn, Mayer, Thillmann, Leopold, & Leutner, 2010).”