AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE WITH THE INDCOL MEASURE OF INDIVIDUALISM AND COLLECTIVISM: IMPLICATIONS FOR VALID CROSS‐CULTURAL INFERENCE

By C. Robert, Wayne C. Lee, Kim-Yin Chan. 2006

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33fd532471eb226a14d27e5431faa731dc95442a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Arménio Rego
2. Miguel Pina e Cunha
3. Neuza Ribeiro
4. C. Robert
5. Steffen Raub

In Social Psychology

1. Neuza Ribeiro
2. Arménio Rego
3. Miguel Pina e Cunha
4. C. Robert
5. Steffen Raub
6. Carla Susana Marques
7. Filipa Sousa
8. T. Nguyen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Arménio Rego
2. Miguel Pina e Cunha
3. Neuza Ribeiro
4. C. Robert
5. Steffen Raub

Citations in the corpus

• Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values (2010, background): “This analysis examined whether or not it is reasonable to assume that people completing measures in English interpret constructs in the same way as those completing a translated measure (Robert et al., 2006).”
• Perceptions of Organizational Virtuousness and Happiness as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (2010, methodology): “For testing the impact of removing items, we compared mean differences across some groups, both with and without ‘‘problematic’’ items (Chan, 2000; Robert et al., 2006).”