Horizontal Innovation Networks - By and For Users
By Eric von Hippel. 2007
643 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Computer Science Applications, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32bda17105632cb396fa1ee1c8db3bd5fdbe6d90
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
In Computer Science Applications
- Joel West
- Stefan Haefliger
- Georgvon Krogh
- Melissa Archpru Akaka
- Peter M. Jäger
- Johann Füller
- Hans Mühlbacher
- Martin Schreier
In Strategy and Management
- Melissa Archpru Akaka
- J. Koppenjan
- Joel West
- Heiko Wieland
- E. Klijn
- Stephen Louis Vargo
- Stefan Haefliger
- Stuart Cunningham
Citations in the corpus
- Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity (2014, neutral): “Customers, on the other hand, can provide the focal fi rm with product and service feedback that could be used for product, process, and service improvements or development of altogether new products (Lee & Wong, 2009; Von Hippel, 2007).”
- Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development (2006, background): “Some customers are not only knowledgeable but also able to develop their own new products [22, 50, 58, 67, 69].”
- The value increment of mass-customized products: An empirical assessment (2006, background): “In both the industrial and consumer goods fields, customers, or more generally users, are often found to be the initial developers of products, prototypes, and processes which later gain commercial significance (von Hippel, 2002).”
- Managing Distributed Innovation: Strategic Utilization of Open and User Innovation (2012, positive): “Firms have various ways to search for distributed innovation, while the external stakeholders may approach firms to reveal their innovation on their own initiative (Harhoff et al., 2003; von Hippel, 2007).”
- Governance network theory: Past, present and future (2012, background): “…the 1990s, collaboration between private forms, governments and knowledge producers - the triple helix - aimed at the enhancement of innovative capacity of economic regions, districts, clusters and business parks, has received much attention (Lundvall, 1985; Van Himpel, 2007; Dente et al, 2008).”
- Consumer Co‐creation and Situated Creativity (2008, background): “A significant consequence is the rise of consumer involvement in open innovation (von Hippel, 2005, 2007).”
- Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs (2010, background): “Users are considered a source of domain knowledge from ideation to complete product development (von Hippel, 1988; 2007; Baldwin et al. 2006; Ogawa and Piller, 2006; Füller et al., 2007); however, production methods are frequently considered proprietary (Henkel, 2006: 962).”
- Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective (2015, background): “…remains “production”-centric, and maintains a distinction between those who “develop” and those who “adopt” innovations, the realization that users have the capacity to drive innovative efforts (Oudshoorn & Pinch, 2003; von Hippel, 2007) points to a more interactive and systemic view of innovation.”
- Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation (2014, neutral): “In other cases, the firm is explicitly absent (von Hippel, 2007).”
- A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey (2015, neutral): “In the literature, the participation of end-users is indicated as co-creation (Von Hippel 1987).”