Corporate Reputation and Social Performance: The Importance of Fit

By Stephen Brammer, Stephen. Pavelin. 2006

1,116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f26d7128cb9b30cf3be4c761e2539130b20b2c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Giovanna Michelon
2. C. Mallin
3. Michele Fabrizi
4. Sadok El Ghoul
5. Patricia Crifo
6. Omrane Guedhami
7. Kent Walker
8. Stephen. Pavelin

In Strategy and Management

1. Giovanna Michelon
2. C. Mallin
3. Michele Fabrizi
4. Ante Glavas
5. Stephen Brammer
6. Herman Aguinis
7. Kent Walker
8. K. De Roeck

Citations in the corpus

• Organizational Reputation: A Review (2011, background): “…among organizations in the eyes of observers but also about specific comparisons of such attributes as the expertise of forensic accountants; and Brammer and Pavelin (2006), who talk about organizational reputation in terms of overall appeal but also in terms of success in meeting stakeholder…”
• Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources (2010, positive): “In a context of information asymmetries, a firm’s reputation is determined by the signals that stakeholders receive about its corporate behavior (Brammer and Pavelin, 2006).”
• Linking corporate social responsibility to corporate reputation: A study on understanding behavioral consequences (2012, positive): “Similarly, using the assessments of managers and market analysts, Brammer and Pavelin (2006) state that social performance has an enhancing effect on CR but this effect varies both across actors and within sectors across the various types of social performance.”
• Does Sustainable Supplier Cooperation Affect Performance (2012, background): “additional sales or employee satisfaction) to better understand why firms are using social practices also by choice (Brammer and Pavelin 2006 ).”
• The Relationship of CSR and Financial Performance: New Evidence from Indonesian Companies (2009, neutral): “In addition, studies of the CSR-CFP link using contingency factors have also been done, but the contingency factors used in the studies focus on common factor affecting the CSR such the size company and type of industry and not related to important factors affecting corporate performance (for exampl”
• The Role of CEO’s Personal Incentives in Driving Corporate Social Responsibility (2014, methodology): “This approach is commonly used in papers relying on EIRIS data (see Brammer and Pavelin, 2004; Cox et al., 2004; Brammer et al., 2006; Brammer and Pavelin, 2006; Cox et al., 2007).”
• What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility (2012, background): “For example, external outcomes include reputation of the firm (Brammer & Pavelin, 2006) and consumer choice of firm or product (Arora & Henderson, 2007).”
• Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable? (2017, background): “An ethical approach to these issues becomes part of the company’s business model, through practices that enhance its reputation in the eyes of its customers and other stakeholders and can be an important part of its marketing strategy (Brammer and Pavelin 2006).”
• Women in the boardroom and their impact on climate change related disclosure (2017, background): “This is because a firm with higher profits also has more resources to spend on the quantity and quality of carbon disclosure (Brammer and Pavelin, 2006).”