Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources

By Jordi A. Surroca, J. Tribó, S. Waddock. 2010

2,103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab029571667e189037352f09e591c5ccfbb5fc75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance? (2011, positive): “Some authors already provided important studies in which similar combinations were attempted (see, for example, Bansal, 2005; Hillman and Keim, 2001; Ruf et al., 2001; Surroca et al., 2010; Wahba, 2008).”
Do Investors Value a Firm’s Commitment to Social Activities? (2013, neutral): “As of date, research is quite mixed on the importance of CSR measures and its impact on corporate financial performance (CFP) (McWilliams and Siegel 2000, 2001; Barnett and Salomon 2006; Prior et al. 2008; Hull and Rothenberg 2008; Surroca et al. 2010).”
Mind the Gap: The Interplay Between External and Internal Actions in the Case of Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, background): “For example, Surroca, Tribó, and Waddock (2010) provide empirical evidence for the mediating effect of a firm’s intangible assets in the CSRvalue creation process.”
Corporate Social Performance, Analyst Stock Recommendations, and Firm Future Returns (2015, positive): “management literature (e.g., Coombs and Gilley, 2005; Surroca et al., 2010), to construct an alternative measure of CSP.”
Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation (2014, background): “Socially responsible firms are more likely to enjoy greater trust, higher levels of satisfaction and loyalty among various stakeholders, including customers, employees, investors, business partners, and communities (Du et al. 2011, 2007; Klein and Dawar 2004; Surroca et al. 2010).”
The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential (2018, background): “Slack resources theory suggests a reverse causality, where superior financial performance results in enough slack to entertain sustainable activities [17].”
Employer–Employee Congruence in Environmental Values: An Exploration of Effects on Job Satisfaction and Creativity (2014, positive): “More specifically, we build on recent insights generated by Surroca et al. (2010), who use secondary data at a firm level to identify innovation (measured by the ratio of R&D spending per employee) as a mediator between a firm’s multidimensional corporate responsibility rating (including…”
Sustainability Matter and Financial Performance of Companies (2017, methodology): “One variable widely used as a proxy for risk in previous studies [65] is the level of leverage of the company (Levrat).”
When Does It Pay to be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review (2017, background): “2004), the lack of sector specificity, or the treatment of ordinal measures (Surroca et al. 2010), our analysis points to the fact that—despite relying on one and the same KLD database—the studies actually involve different independent variables.”