Determinants of Student Evaluations of Global Measures of Instructor and Course Value
By R. B. Marks. 2000
160 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d240ba92a313ed06fdf3ff80ef28541bfeb945f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- M. Goos
- A. Salomons
- Bert Brockx
- D. Mortelmans
- P. Spooren
- D. Clayson
- James B. Wilcox
- Luis Filipe Lages
In Social Psychology
- M. Goos
- A. Salomons
- Bert Brockx
- D. Mortelmans
- P. Spooren
- D. Clayson
- James B. Wilcox
- Luis Filipe Lages
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations (2017, background): “A second explanation is focused on grading leniency: if students receive lower grades for a given amount of learning, they rate the course less favorably (Marks 2000; McPherson and Jewell 2007), consistent with cognitive dissonance theories (Maurer 2006).”
- International and Local Student Satisfaction: Resources and Capabilities Perspective (2004, background): “As Marks (Marks 2000) noted, there is considerable divergence in findings and a huge controversy about student evaluations of teaching because agreement on the appropriate criteria for measuring student evaluation has never been achieved.”
- Professor Brand Advocacy: Do Brand Relationships Matter? (2010, background): “Regarding student evaluations, researchers have focused on the usefulness of student evaluations (Aigner & Thum, 1986), student judgments of instructor effectiveness (Bailey, Gupta, & Schrader, 2000), evaluation measures (Clayson & Haley, 1990; Grunenwald & Ackerman, 1986; Herche & Swenson, 1991; Ma”
- On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “…fundamental content Relevance Challenging beliefs Active learning Teacher–student relationships Motivation Organization Flexibility Assessment Marks (2000) Initial instrument 5 Organization Workload/difficulty Expected/fairness of grading Instructor liking/concern Perceived learning Marsh…”
- Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance (2007, methodology): “As prior research (Marks, 2000; Young et al., 2003) has proposed, students learn more when they are motivated and interested in the course.”
- Student Evaluations of Teaching: Are They Related to What Students Learn? (2009, methodology): “Compare these to a well-received research article on SET by Marks (2000) published in the Journal of Marketing Education.”
- Causes and Effects of Teacher Conflict-Inducing Attitudes towards Pupils: A Path Analysis Model. (2002, background): “However, the quality of TPI (teacher liking) has a very strong influence on the overall score when students evaluate their teachers (Marks, 2000).”