On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching

By P. Spooren, Bert Brockx, D. Mortelmans. 2013

693 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b060535ac010f40677a2a791420c333adcc41f24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. C. Englund
2. Linda Price
3. Anders D. Olofsson
4. M. Goos
5. H. Hornstein
6. A. Salomons

In Social Psychology

1. M. Goos
2. H. Hornstein
3. A. Salomons

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations (2017, methodology): “…end of the typical online SET response range of 30–50 % reported in other studies (e.g. see Adams and Umbach 2012; Layne et al. 1999; Nulty 2008; Spooren et al. 2013): this suggests that, if anything, more selection bias may be found in institutions with response rates at the lower end of this…”
• Questionnaire evaluating teaching competencies in the university environment. Evaluation of teaching competencies in the university (2015, neutral): “…reliability necessary for evaluating teaching effectiveness (Khong, 2014; Onwuegbuzie, Daniels, & Collins, 2009), the revision study carried out by Spooren, Brockx and Mortelmans (2013) warns that there are still certain controversies in this regard in the literature, given that the majority of…”
• Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice (2017, background): “Increasing evidence suggests that they are valid and reliable indicators (Benton, Cashin, & Kansas, 2012; Marsh, 1987; Spooren, Brockx, & Mortelmans, 2013).”
• Evaluating and enhancing quality in higher education teaching practice: a meta- review (2020, methodology): “Spooren, Brockx, and Mortelmans (2013) highlight the use of student feedback by teachers for identifying quality of delivery or content issues that may often be relatively minor such as slide presentation (Spooren, Brockx, and Mortelmans 2013).”
• Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance (2017, methodology): “In other words, SET has evolved into the dominant, and in many cases, sole indicator of teaching competence (Berk, 2005; Galbraith, Merrill, & Kline, 2012; Spooren et al., 2013).”