M. Goos

Economics and Econometrics · with Manning · 2004–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 22 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Goos trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Michael A. McPherson
  2. Lyle Ungar
  3. Nathan Berg
  4. David H. Autor
  5. Daron Acemoglu
  6. R. Perry
  7. Stephen R. Porter
  8. P. Spooren
  9. Eric A. Hanushek
  10. D. Nulty

Who trusts M. Goos overall

  1. David H. Autor
  2. Guy Michaels
  3. C. Frey
  4. Thiemo Fetzer
  5. Georg Graetz
  6. John Van Reenen
  7. Zsófia L. Bárány
  8. S. Thewissen
  9. Daron Acemoglu
  10. Guido Matias Cortes

Papers from M. Goos's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Goos trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching
  2. Student Evaluations of Teaching: Are They Related to What Students Learn?
  3. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?
  4. Do Higher Grades Lead to Favorable Student Evaluations?
  5. Web-based student evaluations of professors: the relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness
  6. Determinants of Student Evaluations of Global Measures of Instructor and Course Value
  7. What Determines Student Evaluation Scores? A Random Effects Analysis of Undergraduate Economics Classes
  8. Determinants of How Students Evaluate Teachers
  9. Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in‐class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations
  10. Chapter 18 Teacher Quality

Their papers