D. Mortelmans

Education · 2006–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 20 researchers and is trusted by 3 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom D. Mortelmans trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. J. Kulik
  2. D. Clayson
  3. David Kember
  4. Herbert W. Marsh
  5. Tenko Raykov
  6. Timothy A. Brown
  7. D. Annis
  8. J. Centra
  9. F. Zabaleta
  10. Carol L. Patrick

Who trusts D. Mortelmans overall

  1. H. Hornstein
  2. M. Goos

Papers from D. Mortelmans's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers D. Mortelmans trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Effects of Grading Leniency and Low Workload on Students' Evaluations of Teaching: Popular Myth, Bias, Validity, or Innocent Bystanders?
  2. Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Ratings 1
  3. Student Ratings: Validity, Utility, and Controversy
  4. Implications for evaluation from a study of students' perceptions of good and poor teaching
  5. Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to Students' Evaluations of University Teaching
  6. Personality and the Student Evaluation of Teaching
  7. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay
  8. Looking for Bias in All the Wrong Places: A Search for Truth or a Witch Hunt in Student Ratings of Instruction?.
  9. Does the Use of Student Feedback Questionnaires Improve the Overall Quality of Teaching?
  10. New Lines in Edumetrics: New Forms of Assessment Lead to New Assessment Criteria.

Their papers