Servant Leadership, Hope, and Organizational Virtuousness: A Framework Exploring Positive Micro and Macro Behaviors and Performance Impact

By Travis P. Searle, J. Barbuto. 2011

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29b0ef41ab2b638c5087acf2243aa5b11bd93355

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. B. Bande
2. Fernando Jaramillo
3. J. Varela

In Social Psychology

1. B. Bande
2. Jan G Langhof
3. Madelyn Geldenhuys
4. Fernando Jaramillo
5. J. Varela
6. Stefan Güldenberg

Citations in the corpus

• Servant Leadership: A systematic literature review—toward a model of antecedents and outcomes (2019, background): “Quantitative Commitment Other Hu and Liden (2011) Empirical Other Team potency Team effectiveness Ebener and O’Connell (2010) Empirical (case study) Culture OCB Searle and Barbuto (2010) Conceptual Hope Other”
• The Functions of a Servant Leader (2017, background): “Stewardship was defined in the literature as the process to take accountability [10,64] for the common interest of a society, an organisation, and individuals [6,10,36,41,50,65], and to leave a positive legacy [66], with an attitude of not being the owner, but rather a caretaker [6,10,35,36,41,50,61”
• Servant leadership and ethics: a dyadic examination of supervisor behaviors and salesperson perceptions (2015, background): “Searle and Barbuto (2011) posit that employees function at optimal levels under servant leadership because this leadership style centers on optimizing individuals’ strengths rather than critical evaluation.”