Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions.

By Katherine J Klein, P. Bliese, Steve W. J. Kozlowski, F. Dansereau, M. Gavin, Mark A. Griffin, David Hofmann, Lawrence R. James, Francis J. Yammarino, Michelle C. Bligh. 2000

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28b0b7ef71bd20c7485357dc190b087a48003c30

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a GLOBE study of 15 countries (2006, background): “Together, our analyses suggest acceptable levels of ICC values, especially as the relatively few raters within firms can restrict ICC2 levels (Klein et al., 2000).”
Servant leadership and team performance: The mediating role of knowledge-sharing climate (2015, background): “Because these values were all above the cut-off values, we determined that the data aggregation of servant leadership and knowledge-sharing climate was justified (Bliese, 2000; Klein et al., 2000).”
First Among Equals: The Effect of Team Leader Characteristics on the Internal Dynamics of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams (2009, background): “While there are few hard and fast standards to determine an acceptable level of aggregation (Klein et al 2000, p.518), aggregation to the higher level is justified if a significant amount of the variance in the constructs lies between groups (Klein and Kozlowski 2000).”
From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research (2000, methodology): “Klein et al. (2000) present an example illustrating these differences among the analytic techniques.”
Offshore information systems project success: the role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics (2009, background): “Consequently, resulting standard errors become artificially small, increasing the likelihood of Type I error (Bliese and Hanges 2004; see also Klein et al. 2000).”
Data Aggregation in Multilevel Analysis: A Review of Conceptual and Statistical Issues (2006, methodology): “Given the differences between the analyses, Klein et al. (2000) argued that several indexes should be utilized before making an aggregation decision unless the theoretical framework clearly specifies otherwise. The use of multiple indexes adds to the robustness of data interpretation. For example, i”
National cultures and safety orientation: A study of seafarers working for Norwegian shipping companies (2007, background): “All ICC(1) and ICC(2) tests were significant at the .001 level, meaning that aggregation of individual scores is acceptable here (Klein et al., 2000).”
Diagnosing organizational cultures: A conceptual and empirical review of culture effectiveness surveys (2014, background): “Values greater than .70 have generally been recognized as sufficient response consistency to justify aggregating individual responses to the group level (Klein et al., 2000).”
Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as though They Were Independent (2004, methodology): “Using procedures described in Bliese (1998) and also used in Klein et al. (2000), we added betweengroup variance by simulating different ICC values.”
Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams (2009, background): “Both conceptual and empirical evidence is needed when aggregation decisions are made (e.g., Klein et al., 2000).”
“See You in Court”: How CEO narcissism increases firms' vulnerability to lawsuits (2017, unknown): “We obtained values for all firms ( x _ = 0.78, s.d. = 0.11) that ex- ceeded the recommended minimum value of 0.70 (Klein et al., 2000), indicating high within-firm (CEO) agreement.”
Advancing research on team process dynamics (2015, background): “But, by the turn of the century, greater clarity in construct conceptualization and measurement (Bliese, 2000; Chan, 1998; James, Demaree, & Wolf, 1984, 1993; Kozlowski & Hattrup, 1992), the promulgation of principles to guide theory building and research design (Kozlowski & Klein, 2000), and advanc”
The Personality Composition of Teams and Creativity: The Moderating Role of Team Creative Confidence (2008, background): “The median value for rWG(3) across the remaining 145 teams was .83 at T1 and .87 at T2, indicating adequate levels of agreement and justifying aggregation of data across team members (Klein et al., 2000).”