Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups

By Richard P. Bagozzi, Utpal M. Dholakia. Management Sciences, 2006

757 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Computer Science Applications, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2579e5dce3f157103866b7478451ebe865c80a59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Computer Science Applications

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Role of Anticipated Emotions in Purchase Intentions (2016, methodology): “A broad body of work proposes that groups of both positive and negative AEs toward achieving a future goal or not influence behavioral intention (Bagozzi & Dholakia, 2006b; Perugini & Bagozzi, 2001, Xie et al., 2013).”
A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks (2010, background): “For instances, Dholakia et al. [10] proposed and empirically tested a social influence model of virtual communities.”
Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction (2012, background): “This will lead to some differences in motivations (e.g., intrinsic and extrinsic) (Bagozzi and Dholakia 2006; Hars and Ou 2002; Ke and Zhang, 2009, 2010; Lakhani and Wolf 2005; Roberts et al. 2006) and incentive mechanism.”
Narrative Transportation and Paratextual Features of Social Media in Viral Advertising (2018, background): “…managers could aim to strengthen personal ties among their target consumers of a given SNS platform, perhaps by considering cultural congruency and fluency (Ko, Seo, and Jung 2015), encouraging personal consumer-toconsumer interactions, and fostering online communities (Bagozzi and Dholakia 2006).”
Crowd-Funding: Transforming Customers into Investors through Innovative Service Platforms (2011, background): “Brand-community members are typically motivated by fun, learning, identification, and status, especially when the activity is shared in social networks ( Bagozzi and Dholakia, 2006”
The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? (2012, background): “Probably one of the most extreme and most frequently cited examples of user innovation is open-source software (such as Apache or Linux), which is developed exclusively by a community of users rather than professional software developers employed by firms (Bagozzi and Dholakia, 2006; Lakhani and von”
The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media (2014, methodology): “…2005; McAlexander et al., 2002), online/virtual (Adjei, Noble, & Noble, 2010; Muñiz & Schau, 2007; Thompson & Sinha, 2008), small or large (Bagozzi & Dholakia, 2006a; McAlexander & Koenig, 2010), temporary (Schouten, McAlexander, & Koenig, 2007), and even can develop around such mundane…”
Understanding consumer intention to participate in online travel community and effects on consumer intention to purchase travel online and WOM: An integration of innovation diffusion theory and TAM with trust (2016, neutral): “Continuing participation in an online community joint activities helps the community members achieve common goals (Bagozzi & Dholakia, 2006) and is a key factor for community endurance (Koh & Kim, 2004).”
Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities (2011, background): “…motivational factors based on self-interest (e.g., Lakhani and von Hippel 2003, Lerner and Tirole 2002, von Hippel and von Krogh 2003), identity (Bagozzi and Dholakia 2006, Blanchard and Markus 2004, Ma and Agarwal 2007, Ren et al. 2007, Stewart and Gosain 2006), social capital (Nambisan and…”
The Shoemaker's Children: Using Wikis for Information Systems Teaching, Research, and Publication (2009, background): “…1999), apprenticeship (Lave and Wenger 1991), team adaptation (Burke et al. 2006), ease of use (Davis 1989), social identity in online groups (Bagozzi and Dholakia 2006), and social capital (Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998) predict quite nicely to behaviors that are observed in organizational…”