Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities

By Samer Faraj, Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, Ann Majchrzak. Organ. Sci., 2011

1,027 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Computer Science Applications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc7e13b992329bcfaea9142695d5bb06de596703

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Computer Science Applications

Citations in the corpus

Information Technology and Product/Service Innovation: A Brief Assessment and Some Suggestions for Future Research (2013, background): “Recently proposed IS concepts such as “fluidity” in online communities (Faraj et al., 2011) and “digitalization” or the socio technical processes accompanying digitization (Tilson, Lyytinen, Sørensen, 2010) have the potential to inform the above issues.”
Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge (2011, neutral): “An exciting new line of research on the context and creativity examines knowledge creation in the context of online communities (Faraj et al. 2011).”
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World (2012, background): “Consequently, firms are drawing on novel forms of organizing, such as online communities (Faraj et al. 2011), open innovation (Boudreau 2010), and innovation challenges (Boudreau et al.”
Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System (2015, background): “These scholars argue that the emergence of such unbounded and generative innovations represents a fundamental departure from the earlier forms of innovations that are dominated by large firms (Faraj et al. 2011; Yoo et al. 2012).”
Digital Technologies as External Enablers of New Venture Creation in the IT Hardware Sector (2018, background): “For example, a stable set of inputs and outputs reduces coordination eﬀorts, transaction costs (Baldwin & Woodard, 2009), and variations in quality, allowing digital technologies to channel resources more eﬃciently (Faraj, Jarvenpaa, & Majchrzak, 2011).”
The Needs-Affordances-Features Perspective for the Use of Social Media (2018, neutral): “…for virtual worlds (Davis et al. 2009; Goel et al. 2013; Junglas et al. 2013; Nardon and Allen 2012; Schultze 2010); two for online communities (Faraj et al. 2011; Ma and Agarwal 2007); two for social media in general (Halpern and Gibbs 2013; Kietzmann et al. 2011); one for social media in…”
Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective (2015, background): “Faraj et al. (2011) offer some promising starting points in this regard—specifically, enactment of temporary roles by actors (e.”
The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing (2013, neutral): “Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2536058 Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication”
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control (2020, background): “Firms also utilize algorithmic restricting on online platforms used for participatory production, where customers produce and share content as they consume it (e.g., Faraj, Jarvenpaa, & Majchrzak, 2011; Karunakaran, 2018).”
Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm (2018, methodology): “The tasks are then decomposed by the algorithm into smaller ones that allow a divide-and-assign strategy so that they can be allocated to individual workers (Faraj et al., 2011; Boudreau and Lakhani, 2013).”
Technology Ecosystem Governance (2014, background): “Finally, ecosystems must harness individual identifications for agile, entrepreneurial responses to client needs (Faraj et al. 2011), yet cultivate collective identifications for the larger social goods of the ecosystem (Ibarra et al. 2005).”