Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction

By Yuxiang (Chris) Zhao, Qinghua Zhu. Information Systems Frontiers, 2012

590 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Computer Science Applications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e23efe8f78d280be6fe7c81958834a01179ce957

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. E. Seltzer
2. Dillon Mahmoudi

In Computer Science Applications

1. E. Seltzer
2. Dillon Mahmoudi

Citations in the corpus

• Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2018, unknown): “Several reasons can be behind the solvers’ decision to take part in a crowdsourcing contest (see Table 1) and numerous studies are taken up with identifying them (Tokarchuk, Cuel and Zamarian, 2012; Ali Acar and van den Ende, 2011; Hossain, 2012; Rouse, 2010; Zhao and Zhu, 2014).”
• Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing (2013, background): “Zhao and Zhu (2012), in their evaluation of research on crowdsourcing, distinguished crowdsourcing from open innovation generally and open source code development more specifically by noting that crowdsourcing was not ‘‘open,’’ but instead relied on individual and independent work.”