Callings and Organizational Behavior.

By A. Elangovan, C. Pinder, Murdith Mclean. 2010

390 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/229b4256a48565bfdf74fdab7f8d2e1e65796823

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Health

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

South Korean Salespersons’ Calling, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (2016, background): “01. objective career success and more relevant to subjective success and contextual behavior, such as OCB (Elangovan et al., 2010; Hall & Chandler, 2005).”
Using goal facilitation theory to explain the relationships between calling and organization-directed citizenship behavior and job satisfaction (2017, background): “Elangovan et al. (2010) argued that the concept of calling held significant promise for enriching our understanding of a range of organizational phenomena and discussed its implications for OCB in detail.”
Development and Validation of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ) and Brief Calling Scale (BCS) (2012, background): “Finally, unidimensional strategies are unable to examine complexities that may exist in how people express or experience a sense of calling, given that the construct has been conceptualized as multidimensional in nature (e.g., Dik & Duffy, 2009; Elangovan et al., 2010).”
On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review (2010, background): “…et al., 2010; Dik & Duffy, 2009; Dobrow, 2004), illuminating various dimensions and consequences of a calling (Bunderson & Thompson, 2009; Dobrow, 2006a; Elangovan et al., 2010), and analyzing how callings are experienced (Berg, Grant, et al., 2010; Bunderson & Thompson, 2009; Dobrow, 2006b).”
#Trending topics in careers: a review and future research agenda (2017, background): “For example, Elangovan et al. (2010) argued that we need to study multiple callings and examine whether these might develop in sequences or rather that several callings can co-exist at the same time.”
Testing a Calling Model of Psychological Career Success in Australian Young Adults: A Longitudinal Study (2014, background): “This view is consistent with goal-setting theory (Locke & Latham, 1990) and other views that describe calling as a context-specific goal (Duffy & Dik, 2013) that promotes human agency (Elangovan et al., 2010; Hall & Chandler, 2005).”
Work as a Calling in China (2015, background): “This finding is consistent with previous studies that found participants to apply the concept very broadly to multiple life domains not limited to the career domain (e.g., Elangovan et al., 2010; Hunter et al., 2010).”
Self-Regulatory Processes Mediating Between Career Calling and Perceived Employability and Life Satisfaction in Emerging Adults (2015, positive): “Consistent with these views, career calling is increasingly regarded as a developmental and dynamic construct (Elangovan et al., 2010; Weiss et al., 2004), which might begin before one is work-ready, and which can be adapted in changing circumstances and shaped by other external factors, such as by…”