British Psychology Students' Perceptions of Group-Work and Peer Assessment

By A. Walker. 2001

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bd8a153db8ee9af395c96c80b1d61482700cdd5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? (2010, background): “Students also doubt their own and peers’ knowledge within a given subject area (Hanrahan & Isaacs, 2001), as well as their own and peers’ skill to peer assess (Van Gennip, Segers, Tillema, this issue; Walker, 2001).”
Toward Fairness in Assessing Student Groupwork: A Protocol for Peer Evaluation of Individual Contributions (2006, background): “, timing, work load), particularly concerned about groupwork because of mistrust in the other group members’ commitment to joint tasks, and about the fairness of assessment that does not account for differential individual inputs (Conway, Kember, Sivan, & Wu, 1993; Walker, 2002).”
The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation (2012, background): “Even when students have favorable attitudes toward group work and the use of peer evaluations, they may worry that they lack enough training to rate their peers and that peer ratings may be biased (Walker, 2001).”
Individual differences in negative group work experiences in collaborative student learning (2008, background): “Most authors discussing negative perceptions of group work present either anecdotal evidence or case studies (Feichtner & Davis, 1985; Salomon & Globerson, 1989), or focus specifically on the measurement of attitudes towards group work and satisfaction with assessment methods (Cantwell & Andrews, 20”
Developing Employability Skills: Peer Assessment in Higher Education. (2006, background): “potential for providing increased levels of feedback without increasing demands on tutors ( Walker, 2001”