Current Emotion Research in Organizational Behavior

By Neal M. Ashkanasy, R. Humphrey. 2011

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b1b67674689ec19eca176809dd86d21d9da50a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Energizing Nature of Work Engagement: Toward a New Need-Based Theory of Work Motivation (2017, background): “…emphasis on discrete emotions in organizational research, and advancements in the measure of discrete emotional events (Ashkanasy & Daus, 2002; Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011; Elfenbein, 2007; Judge, Weiss, Kammeyer-Mueller, & Hulin, 2017; Lam, Weiss, Welch, & Hulin, 2009), compel further…”
Feeling Mixed, Ambivalent, and in Flux: The Social Functions of Emotional Complexity for Leaders (2017, background): “…to or not, leaders serve to “model emotions” (Pescosolido, 2002: 593); their expressed affect influences the affective experiences of followers (e.g., Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011) and also provides information to followers about their values, attitudes, and intentions as a leader (Van Kleef, De…”
Leader emotional intelligence and subordinate job satisfaction:a meta-analysis of main, mediator, and moderator effects (2016, neutral): “…events theory (AET) (Weiss&Cropanzano, 1996), emotional contagion theory (Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1992), and the multilevel model of emotion and leadership (Ashkanasy, 2003; Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011a, 2011b), to explain how leaders' EI contributes to subordinates' job satisfaction.”
Eyes Wide Open: Perceived Exploitation and Its Consequences (2019, background): “In the organizational behavior literature, scholars have distinguished between mood and distinct emotion episodes (for a review, see Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011).”
Emotions in the Workplace (2017, methodology): “The consequence is that processes of emotional expression and contagion (i.e., “leading with emotional labor”; see Ashkanasy & Humphrey 2011a, p. 363) at on 09 /”
Emotion Regulation in Achievement Situations: An Integrated Model (2019, background): “Achievement emotions are emotions that arise in situations related to meeting competence-based standards of quality (Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011; Barsade, Brief, & Spataro, 2003; Pekrun, 2006), such as writing a final exam or engaging in a class debate.”
Emotional intelligence, emotional labor, coach burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention in sport leadership (2018, background): “…emotional regulation; interscholastic sports Emotions and the management of emotions have received increasing attention in organizational management and psychology in the past decades because they have been found to affect key workplace attitudes and behaviors (see Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011).”
A multilevel model of transformational leadership, affect, and creative process behavior in work teams (2015, background): “…2005; George & Zhou, 2002, 2007; To, Fisher, & Ashkanasy, in press; Tsai, Chi, Grandey, & Fung, 2012), the behavioral implications of affective experiences can be complicated insofar as their effects are not necessarily parallel across levels (e.g., Ashkanasy, 2003; Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011).”
The Short-lived Benefits of Abusive Supervisory Behavior for Actors: An Investigation of Recovery and Work Engagement (2017, background): “…emotions such as anxiety, depression, and fear in subordinates (Tepper, Moss, Lockhart, & Carr, 2007), which can then be “caught” by supervisors (Ashkanasy & Humphrey, 2011; Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994) because subordinates and supervisors have frequent interactions (Ilies,Wagner,…”
Integrating emotions and affect in theories of management (2017, background): “In view of this “untapped potential,” identified by Ashkanasy and Humphrey (2011a), it seemed that the time was ripe for us to call for organizational scholars to submit their ideas for further theoretical development in this field.”