The Impact of Team Members’ Cultural Values on Productivity, Cooperation, and Empowerment in Self-Managing Work Teams

By Bradley L Kirkman, Debra L. Shapiro. 2001

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1aebe2c0eb7c4b7a162b1ee974ad98b44de638fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Efficacy Advantage: Factors Related to the Formation of Group Efficacy1 (2003, background): “Relatedly, Kirkman and Shapiro (2001), found that collectivism was significantly and positively related to team productivity, team cooperation, and team empowerment.”
Self-Managing Team Performance: A Systematic Review of Multilevel Input Factors (2018, background): “Kirkman and Shapiro (2001) found a significant negative relationship between team level of power distance and team productivity.”
Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias (2004, background): “Some researchers found different results when using standardized data compared with unstandardized data (e.g., Matsumoto, Weissman, Preston, Brown, & Kupperbusch, 1997), whereas others (e.g., Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001) found identical patterns with standardized and unstandardized data.”
Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work (2007, methodology): “It has also been used across cultures in Turkey (Ergeneli et al., 2007), the Philippines (Hechanova et al., 2006), Singapore (Avolio et al., 2004), the UK ( Holdsworth and Cartwright, 2003), Australia (Carless, 2004), and Canada (Laschinger et al., 2004).”
Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. (2007, unknown): “…constructs at lower levels of analysis, including at the level of work teams (Colquitt, Noe, & Jackson, 2002; Driskell & Salas, 1992; Earley, 1999; Eby & Dobbins, 1997; Gibson, 1999; Gibson & Saxton, 2005; Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001; Man & Lam, 2003; Thomas, 1999; Wagner, 1995; Wagner & Moch, 1986).”
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, background): “Notably, numerous other studies examined the influence of culture on team-level mediators and outcomes but did so indexing culture as a team composition variable (i.e., as an average of members’ individual cultural orientations; e.g., Gibson, 1999; Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001).”
The Culturally Intelligent Team (2013, background): “…norms, as well as implications of team cultural value composition for team processes (Bettenhausen & Murnighan, 1991; Earley & Mosakowski, 2000; Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001a, 2001b; Klein et al., 2011), we investigate the antecedents of shared team values, a novel construct that captures the…”
Why Turnover Matters in Self-Managing Work Teams: Learning, Social Integration, and Task Flexibility (2010, background): “…to result in a number of important benefits, including increased worker satisfaction and engagement in team tasks (Cordery, Mueller, & Smith, 1991; Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001; Wall, Kemp, Jackson, & Clegg, 1986) and higher productivity and quality (Cohen & Ledford, 1994; Goodman, Devadas, & Hughson,…”
Modeling team knowledge sharing and team flexibility: The role of within-team competition (2014, background): “Team collectivism could have a direct impact on team empowerment (Kirkman and Shapiro, 2001) and subsequently affect knowledge sharing and team flexibility (Gundlach et al.”
Leadership and Team Cohesiveness Across Cultures (2009, background): “Work groups with an individualistic orientation clearly show less cooperative behaviors (Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001a,b; Oeztzel, 1998).”
Cross-cultural organizational behavior. (2007, background): “Employee values of individualism are associated with general resistance to teams, whereas employee values of high power distance, being-orientation, and determinism are related to resistance to self-management in teams (Kirkman & Shapiro 1997, 2001a).”
Students’ Sense of Belonging at School in 41 Countries (2016, background): “By doing so, they conform more closely to group norms, such as turn-taking (Chiu & Chow, 2011), which helps them cooperate more effectively than those in individualistic cultures to find consensus (Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001).”
The effect of team affective tone on team performance: the roles of team identification and team cooperation (2017, background): “Team cooperation is a key antecedent of team performance (Kirkman & Shapiro, 2001; 16 Wagner, 1995; West, Patera, & Carsten, 2009).”