Charismatic leadership, environmental dynamism, and performance

By A. D. De Hoogh, Deanne N. den Hartog, Paul L. Koopman, H. Thierry, Peter Van den Berg, Joost van der Weide, Celeste Wilderom. 2004

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Education, Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1aca3544e568f41138a74eb8036e234f4608141a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Education

In Health

Citations in the corpus

Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research (2011, background): “21, k = 4, N = 715) reported by DeGroot et al. (2000). This was likely due to the stronger relationship between transformational leadership and contextual performance (ρ−̂ = .”
Missing Links In Understanding The Relationship Between Leadership And Organizational Performance (2011, background): “The situation is even more complicated because the relationship between leadership behavior and organizational outcome measures is often quite indirect (Den Hartog et al., 1997; Hoogh et al., 2004).”
Transformational leadership and customer service: A moderated mediation model of negative affectivity and emotion regulation (2012, background): “Nevertheless, Dubin (1976) suggested that well-established theoretical models must include not only constructs and relationships among the constructs, but also the boundaries or domains within which the theory is expected to unfold. Indeed, early work such as Lowe, Kroeck, and Sivasubramaniam (1996)”
Linking the Big Five-Factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership; perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator (2005, methodology): “Also, De Hoogh et al. (2004b) found that the relationship between charismatic leadership and subordinates’ positive work attitude to be stronger in such uncertain, unpredictable environments.”
A Critical Assessment of Charismatic—Transformational Leadership Research: Back to the Drawing Board? (2013, background): “…Emotional climate Collective efficacy Emulation of leader Cole, Bruch, and Shamir (2009) Leader variables Position characteristics Org. performance De Hoogh et al. (2004), Ling, Simsek, Lubatkin, and Veiga (2008b) Identification Follower identification Wieseke et al. (2009) Leader creativity…”
The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies (2007, background): “For example, de Hoogh et al. found that environmental dynamism moderated the relationship between charismatic leadership and performance (de Hoogh, den Hartog, & Koopman, 2004) aswell as personality and leadership behaviors (deHoogh, denHartog,&Koopman, 2005).Additionally, Elenkov & Manev (2005) fou”