How Organizations Learn: Post-flight Reviews in an F-16 Fighter Squadron

By Neta Ron, Raanan Lipshitz, M. Popper. 2006

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18e7c21ba30246b4066deef3ac1859faa70df074

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Learning from Errors: Cognition, Emotions and Safety Culture in the Italian Air Force (2013, background): “…and, without a disciplinary framework, there are bound to be crashes, and by the fact that the core values of the debriefing culture are truthful reporting, public accountability, the ability to admit error, and getting—making the most of—an opportunity to learn” (Ron et al., 2006, p. 1078).”
Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis (2013, background): “Debriefs are a potentially powerful yet simple tool to improve the effectiveness of teams and individuals (Ron et al., 2002), but research and theory have been scattered across multiple disciplines.”
Systematic Reflection (2014, background): “Ron et al. (2006) demonstrated that postflight reviews were vehicles to improve not only individuals’ learning but also aircrews’ performance via shared observations and interpretations of what went good and bad during the flights.”
Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward (2014, background): “Ron et al. (2006) emphasize the importance of sensemaking oriented toward issues rather than individuals in after-flight reviews, maintaining the psychological safety that enables team learning.”
Explaining Discontinuity in Organizational Learning: A Process Analysis (2010, background): “Feedback and feed-forward flows may be reinforcing when prior learning provides procedures and systems for further individual and group learning (Crossan and Berdrow 2003; Ron et al. 2006).”