When Family-Supportive Supervision Matters: Relations between Multiple Sources of Support and Work-Family Balance.

By Jeffrey H. Greenhaus, John C. Ziegert, Tammy D. Allen. 2012

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18ab41aea573d445fcd6522068297a03ab96b16c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Marcello Russo
2. Tammy D. Allen
3. Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
4. Abraham Carmeli
5. E. Kossek
6. Anat Shteigman
7. Georg Bauer
8. Gregor J. Jenny

In Social Psychology

1. Marcello Russo
2. E. Kossek
3. Tammy D. Allen
4. Abraham Carmeli
5. Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
6. Anat Shteigman
7. Cheryl E. Gray
8. K. Merlo

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Marcello Russo
2. E. Kossek
3. Tammy D. Allen
4. Abraham Carmeli
5. Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
6. Anat Shteigman
7. Gregor J. Jenny
8. Georg Bauer

Citations in the corpus

• The Contemporary Career: A Work–Home Perspective (2014, background): “Consistent with a complementarity or enhancement perspective on social capital (Adler & Kwon 2002, Friedman & Greenhaus 2000), Greenhaus et al. (2012b) found that having a family-supportive supervisor was associated with strong feelings of work–family balance only for subordinates whose spouses…”
• Work-Life Boundaries and Well-Being: Does Work-to-Life Integration Impair Well-Being through Lack of Recovery? (2018, methodology): “Work-life balance was measured using the 5-item work-family balance scale (Allen & Kiburz, 2012; Greenhaus et al., 2012).”
• Boundary Management and Work‐Nonwork Balance While Working from Home (2021, methodology): “Three items modified from the Greenhaus et al. (2012) work-family balance measure (e.”
• Workplace and family support and work–life balance: Implications for individual psychological availability and energy at work (2016, methodology): “The measure was assessed using the 5-item scale employed by Greenhaus et al. (2012) to measure WLB.”