University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward (Online) Peer Assessment

By Meichun Lydia Wen, Chin-Chung Tsai. 2006

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/162a8b19f74435e1ff00fcf16970ec0d22169b68

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback (2011, background): “…students expressed concerns about the objectivity of peer assessment due to the possibility of personal bias when comments are given by peers, and some students considered assessment to be the sole responsibility of teachers (Brindley and Scoffield 1998; Liu and Carless 2006; Wen and Tsai 2006).”
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions (2010, background): “Wen and Tsai (2006) found further support for the notion that PA experience contributes to more positive student attitudes.”
The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views (2009, background): “Computer-supported or Web-assisted peer assessment is a contemporary trend for research and practice (Barak and Rafaeli 2004; Wen and Tsai 2006 ).”
How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface (2016, background): “Surveys found positive student attitudes toward peer grading, but also some concern over the fairness and reliability of peer grades [27, 26, 12, 32].”
Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education (2016, methodology): “Thus, a wide variety of methods should be used (Brown, Race, and Rust 1995; Wen and Tsai 2006), and teachers should be designers of the assessment process avoiding the exclusive use of conventional assessment (Boud 1995).”
On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course (2007, background): “Tsai, Liu, Lin, and Yuan (2001) also proposed that online peer assessment can improve the freedom of time and space for peer learners, and may also promote students' attitudes toward peer assessment by utilizing anonymous online marking and feedback (Wen & Tsai, 2006).”
Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study (2014, methodology): “These include: the accuracy and validity of feedback from fellow students, students’ insecurity regarding their peers’ evaluation, the difficulty of awarding a mark and the tendency of learners to over-mark or under-mark (Boud and Holmes 1995; Topping 2009; Wen and Tsai 2006).”