Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

By Diana Pereira, Maria Assunção Flores, L. Niklasson. 2016

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A review of articles published in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, over the last eight years (2006–2013) on assessment in higher education, since the introduction of the Bologna process, is the subject of the paper. The first part discusses the key issue of assessment in higher education and the method used for selecting articles. The second part presents results according to the main emerging themes arising from data analysis: assessment methods, modes of assessment and assessment related to a given teaching and learning method. The paper concludes that the foci of the studies are aligned with assessment practices other than the written test, in accordance with a learner-oriented perspective. Although the implementation of the Bologna process has had different kinds of impact in different European countries, the review shows that the use and effects of a diversity of assessment methods in higher education have been investigated, particularly those pointing to the so-called alternative methods. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca71db24d1443df61ec62cc77efba7d2330a5a2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. Md. Shamim Hossain
  2. Monika Hooda
  3. Ali Rizwan
  4. Chhavi Rana
  5. Omdev Dahiya

Citations in the corpus