Job attitudes and employee engagement: considering the attitude "A-factor"

By Daniel A. Newman, Dana L Joseph, C. Hulin. 2010

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1410ee666da5c08fa31252aec8878b1994f27fb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. B. Shuck
2. Kim F. Nimon
3. Drea Zigarmi
4. Kobena Osam
5. Taesung Brian Kim
6. Thomas G. Reio Jr.

Citations in the corpus

• Construct Overlap Between Employee Engagement and Job Satisfaction: A Function of Semantic Equivalence? (2015, methodology): “Further, Macey and Schneider as well as Newman et al. (2010) indicated that Brayfield and Rothe’s (1951) seminal measure of job satisfaction included overlap with several statements that, at least on the surface, seemed to be intertwined with the nomological net of the engagement concept.”
• Definitional and Conceptual Muddling: Identifying the Positionality of Employee Engagement and Defining the Construct (2017, background): “Newman, Joseph, and Hulin (2010) attempted such work, but as pointed out by Shuck, Nimon, and Zigarmi (2016), they fell decidedly short.”
• Integrative Literature Review: Four Emerging Perspectives of Employee Engagement: An Integrative Literature Review (2011, unknown): “Although no research has suggested that one approach is academically more accepted than another (Christian & Slaughter, 2007) and debate certainly rages (Newman et al., 2010), for HRD scholars and researchers, the need for choosing an approach that uniquely matches the question being posed is clear.”