Positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship: A review of the emerging literature and evidence base
By S. Donaldson, Ia Ko. 2010
271 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13b52ebe16b85c443d9171bc035513d9d0a3274c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Maura J. Mills
- Christina R. Fleck
- J. Simons
- Amy Wrzesniewski
- Justin M. Berg
- Andrzej Kozikowski
- Jane E. Dutton
- J. Buitendach
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Justin M. Berg
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Amy Wrzesniewski
- Jane E. Dutton
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Nicholas Lobuglio
- Adam M. Grant
- M. Tims
In Social Psychology
- Nicholas Lobuglio
- Maura J. Mills
- Christina R. Fleck
- J. Simons
- Amy Wrzesniewski
- Justin M. Berg
- Andrzej Kozikowski
- Jane E. Dutton
Citations in the corpus
- Positive psychology at work: A conceptual review, state-of-practice assessment, and a look ahead (2013, background): “The majority (72%; Donaldson & Ko, 2010) of research exploring various aspects of PPW is crosssectional in nature, utilizing self-reported survey data, and thereby limiting our understanding of PPW constructs and their causal effects on relevant outcomes.”
- Psychological capital, work engagement and organisational commitment amongst call centre employees in South Africa (2013, background): “The Positive Psychology movement places emphasis on the concepts of strengths, virtues, excellence, thriving, happiness, flourishing, resilience, flow and optimal functioning (Donaldson & Ko, 2010).”
- Job Crafting and Cultivating Positive Meaning and Identity in Work (2013, background): “…‘‘old’’ and introduces some ‘‘new’’ – all with an appreciation of the importance of job crafting to the blossoming domain of positive organizational psychology (Donaldson & Ko, 2010) and positive organizational scholarship (Cameron, Dutton, & Quinn, 2003; Cameron & Spreitzer, 2012) more broadly.”